COORDINATED ACTIVITY OF THE NEW RECTUM AND ANAL-SPHINCTER AFTER SPHINCTER-SAVING RESECTION OF THE RECTUM FOR COLITIS OR CARCINOMA

被引:7
作者
LEWIS, WG
HOLDSWORTH, PJ
SAGAR, PM
STEPHENSON, BM
FINAN, PJ
JOHNSTON, D
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, The General Infirmary, Leeds, Yorkshire
关键词
RECTAL CARCINOMA; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;
D O I
10.1007/BF02049315
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether coordinated activity exists across a stapled enteroanal anastomosis. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were studied for a median of one year after complete excision of the rectum and stapled enteroanal anastomosis; 12 patients underwent low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma, and 17 patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis. RESULTS: Maximum anal resting pressures were slightly lower after coloanal anastomosis than after ileoanal anastomosis [median range, 56 (11-60) cm H2O, cf 69 (40-107) cm H2O, P = NS]. During distention of the neorectum, anal sphincter pressures at 2.5, 1.5, and 0.5 cm from the anal verge were significantly lower after coloanal anastomosis compared with after ileoanal anastomosis (P < 0.01 at each station). The volume of neotectal distention required to produce maximal inhibition of the anal sphincter was significantly less after coloanal anastomosis at 50 (range, 20-60) ml of air than after ileoanal anastomosis at 240 (range, 100-420) ml of air (P < 0.01). Minor fecal leakage and urgency of bowel action were significantly more common after coloanal anastomosis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Alterations in the dynamic response of the anal sphincter to distention of the neorectum may explain why the clinical results were better after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis than after coloanal anastomosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1012 / 1019
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]  
LAZORTHES F, 1986, BRIT J SURG, V73, P136, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800730222
[12]   RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY WITH END-TO-END POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS IN PATIENTS OVER THE AGE OF 50 [J].
LEWIS, WG ;
SAGAR, PM ;
HOLDSWORTH, PJ ;
AXON, ATR ;
JOHNSTON, D .
GUT, 1993, 34 (07) :948-952
[13]   ROLE OF THE RECTUM IN THE PHYSIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL-RESULTS OF COLOANAL AND COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS AFTER ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR RECTAL-CARCINOMA [J].
LEWIS, WG ;
HOLDSWORTH, PJ ;
STEPHENSON, BM ;
FINAN, PJ ;
JOHNSTON, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (10) :1082-1086
[14]   EFFECT OF ANORECTAL EVERSION DURING RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY ON ANAL-SPHINCTER FUNCTION [J].
LEWIS, WG ;
HOLDSWORTH, PJ ;
SAGAR, PM ;
HOLMFIELD, JHM ;
JOHNSTON, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (01) :121-123
[15]   TOTAL COLECTOMY AND MUCOSAL PROCTECTOMY WITH PRESERVATION OF CONTINENCE IN ULCERATIVE-COLITIS [J].
MARTIN, LW ;
LECOULTRE, C ;
SCHUBERT, WK .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1977, 186 (04) :477-480
[16]   FACTORS INFLUENCING BOWEL FUNCTION AFTER ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS [J].
NASMYTH, DG ;
JOHNSTON, D ;
GODWIN, PGR ;
DIXON, MF ;
SMITH, A ;
WILLIAMS, NS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (06) :469-473
[17]   RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY WITH ILEAL RESERVOIR FOR ULCERATIVE-COLITIS AND FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS - A COMPARISON OF 3 RESERVOIR DESIGNS [J].
NICHOLLS, RJ ;
PEZIM, ME .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 (06) :470-474
[18]   COMPARISON OF COLONIC RESERVOIR AND STRAIGHT COLO-ANAL RECONSTRUCTION AFTER RECTAL EXCISION [J].
NICHOLLS, RJ ;
LUBOWSKI, DZ ;
DONALDSON, DR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 75 (04) :318-320
[19]   RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY WITH ILEAL RESERVOIR - A PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT [J].
NICHOLLS, RJ ;
BELLIVEAU, P ;
NEILL, M ;
WILKS, M ;
TABAQCHALI, S .
GUT, 1981, 22 (06) :462-468
[20]  
NISSEN R, 1932, ZENTRALBL CHIR, V60, P888