CARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS AND PAPILLA OF VATER - PRESENTING SYMPTOMS, SIGNS, AND DIAGNOSIS RELATED TO STAGE AND TUMOR SITE - A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER TRIAL IN 472 PATIENTS

被引:71
作者
BAKKEVOLD, KE
ARNESJO, B
KAMBESTAD, B
机构
[1] UNIV BERGEN,HAUKELAND HOSP,DEPT SURG,N-5016 BERGEN,NORWAY
[2] UNIV BERGEN,MED INFORMAT & STAT SECT,N-5014 BERGEN,NORWAY
关键词
ADENOCARCINOMA; DELAY; DIAGNOSIS; PANCREAS; PAPILLA OF VATER; PROSPECTIVE TRIAL; SIGNS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.3109/00365529209000081
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
During the period 1984-87, 472 patients with histologically or cytologically verified carcinoma of the pancreas (n = 442) or the papilla of Vater (n = 30) were accrued. Diagnostic investigations were performed in accordance with the ordinary routines of 38 Norwegian hospitals. Jaundice at presentation, found in 47% of the patients, indicated a relatively low staging. Abdominal pain or weight loss, present in 72% and 58%, respectively, indicated higher staging. The sensitivities of the diagnostic investigations were 1) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), 79%, and computed tomography (CT), 75%; 2) ultrasonography (US), 57%; angiography performed in 18% to assess unresectability, sensitivity, 43%; fine-needle aspiration cytology performed in 27%, sensitivity, 86%; and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) performed solely on papillar and head tumours in 16%, sensitivity, 85%. In stage 1, PTC and ERCP had a sensitivity of 78%; CT, 52%; and US, 40%. Patient's, physician's, and diagnostic delay averaged 1.8, 2.4, and 4.0 months, respectively. The delays were shortest in stage I and papillar carcinomas.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 325
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [31] Hermanek P., 1987, TNM CLASSIFICATION M, V4th ed.
  • [32] IMPORTANCE OF PATHOLOGIC STAGING IN SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF EXOCRINE PANCREAS
    HERMRECK, AS
    THOMAS, CY
    FRIESEN, SR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1974, 127 (06) : 653 - 657
  • [33] TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY FOR CANCER - APPRAISAL OF 65 CASES
    IHSE, I
    LILJA, P
    ARNESJO, B
    BENGMARK, S
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1977, 186 (06) : 675 - 680
  • [34] ISHIKAWA O, 1989, CANCER, V64, P1107, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890901)64:5<1107::AID-CNCR2820640523>3.0.CO
  • [35] 2-Y
  • [36] PERIAMPULLARY TUMORS - WHICH ONES SHOULD BE RESECTED
    JONES, BA
    LANGER, B
    TAYLOR, BR
    GIROTTI, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 149 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [37] KAIRALUOMA MI, 1985, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V151, P69
  • [38] CARCINOMA OF THE AMPULLA OF VATER
    KNOX, RA
    KINGSTON, RD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (01) : 72 - 73
  • [39] DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA - A COMPARISON WITH OTHER RADIOLOGIC METHODS
    KOLMANNSKOG, F
    SCHRUMPF, E
    BERGAN, A
    LARSEN, S
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA-DIAGNOSIS, 1982, 23 (02): : 131 - 141
  • [40] LEMON HM, 1973, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V31, P17, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197301)31:1<17::AID-CNCR2820310104>3.0.CO