TENSILE DUCTILITY OF SUPERPLASTIC CERAMICS AND METALLIC ALLOYS

被引:121
作者
KIM, WJ [1 ]
WOLFENSTINE, J [1 ]
SHERBY, OD [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF IRVINE, DEPT MECH ENGN, MAT SECT, IRVINE, CA 92717 USA
来源
ACTA METALLURGICA ET MATERIALIA | 1991年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0956-7151(91)90268-6
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Superplastic ceramics and metallic alloys exhibit different trends in tensile ductility in the range where the strain-rate-sensitivity exponent, m, is high (m greater-than-or-equal-to 0.5). The tensile ductility of super-plastic metallic alloys (e.g. fine-grained zinc, aluminum, nickel and titanium alloys) is primarily a function of the strain-rate-sensitivity exponent. In contrast, the tensile ductility of superplastic ceramic materials (e.g. zirconia, alumina, zirconia-alumina composites and iron carbide) is not a function of the strain-rate-sensitivity exponent, but also a function of the parameter epsilon exp(Q(c)/RT) where epsilon is the steady-state strain rate and Q(c) is the activation energy for superplastic flow. Superplastic ceramic materials exhibit a large decrease in tensile elongation with an increase in epsilon exp(Q(c)/RT). This trend in tensile elongation is explained based on a "fracture-mechanics" model. The model predicts that tensile ductility increases with a decrease in flow stress, a decrease in grain size and an increase in the parameter (2-gamma(s) - gamma-gb), where gamma(s) is the surface energy and gamma-gb is the grain boundary energy. The difference in the tensile ductility behavior of superplastic ceramics and metallic alloys can be related to their different failure mechanisms. Superplastic ceramics deform without necking and fail by intergranular cracks that propagate perpendicular to the applied tensile axis. In contrast, superplastic metallic alloys commonly fail by intergranular and transgranular (shearing) mechanisms with associated void formation in the neck region.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 208
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]  
FLECK RG, 1970, METALL TRANS, V1, P3415
[12]  
FROST HJ, 1982, DEFORMATION MECHANIS, pCH14
[13]  
GEARY B, 1985, SUPERPLASTICITY AERO
[14]  
GILMAN JJ, 1963, NBS MONOGRAPH, V59, P79
[15]   OBSERVATIONS ON THE DIFFERENCES REPORTED IN REGION-I FOR THE SUPERPLASTIC ZN-22-PERCENT A1 EUTECTOID [J].
GRIVAS, D ;
MORRIS, JW ;
LANGDON, TG .
SCRIPTA METALLURGICA, 1981, 15 (02) :229-236
[16]  
GRUFFEL P, 1988, SCI CERAM, V14, P587
[17]  
HAMILTON CH, 1989, NATO AGARD LECTURE S, V154
[18]  
HAYDEN HW, 1967, ASM TRANS Q, V60, P3
[19]  
HERMANSSON T, 1988, SUPERPLASTICITY SUPE
[20]  
HIGASHI K, 1988, COMMUNICATION