DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING EVALUATION OF RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION

被引:15
作者
KING, BF
机构
[1] Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, 55905, MN, 200 First Street, SW
来源
ABDOMINAL IMAGING | 1995年 / 20卷 / 05期
关键词
RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION; RENAL ARTERY STENOSIS; CAPTOPRIL RENOGRAPHY; DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY; MR ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/BF01213259
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Over 50 million people in the United States are hypertensive. Renovascular disease accounts for 3-5% of these hypertensive patients, Because renovascular hypertension is potentially curable, much effort has been devoted to detecting and treating renal artery stenosis. Conventional angiography has been traditionally used to diagnose renal artery stenosis. However, because of its invasiveness and cost, conventional angiography cannot be utilized as a screening test in all patients who may have renal artery stenosis. Several noninvasive studies have been advocated for screening in hypertensive patients who may have renovascular disease. However, the accuracy of these noninvasive studies is widely variable, and appropriate use of these noninvasive studies needs to be better defined. Appropriate use of diagnostic imaging examinations for hypertensive patients depends on the index of suspicion for renovascular disease and on the patient's renal function. If certain clinical findings suggest the possibility of renovascular disease, then conventional angiography/intraarterial digital subtraction angiography should be performed. Captopril renography or duplex Doppler sonography could also be utilized if angiography is not desired or is contraindicated because of impaired renal function or a contrast allergy. Magnetic resonance angiography appears to be most helpful in a small, select group of patients who are likely to have proximal renal artery stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 405
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   IMAGING ADVANCES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION [J].
HILLMAN, BJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 153 (01) :5-14
[22]   RENAL DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY - 100 CASES [J].
HILLMAN, BJ ;
OVITT, TW ;
CAPP, MP ;
FISHER, HD ;
FROST, MM ;
NUDELMAN, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 145 (03) :643-646
[23]   INTRAARTERIAL DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY IN HYPERTENSIVE AZOTEMIC PATIENTS [J].
ILLESCAS, FF ;
FORD, K ;
BRAUN, SD ;
DUNNICK, NR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1984, 143 (05) :1065-1067
[24]   ABDOMINAL-AORTA AND RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - EVALUATION WITH MR ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
KIM, D ;
EDELMAN, RR ;
KENT, KC ;
PORTER, DH ;
SKILLMAN, JJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (03) :727-731
[25]  
KLETTER K, 1990, CONTRIB NEPHROL, V79, P190
[26]   NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS BY ULTRASONIC DUPLEX SCANNING [J].
KOHLER, TR ;
ZIERLER, RE ;
MARTIN, RL ;
NICHOLLS, SC ;
BERGELIN, RO ;
KAZMERS, A ;
BEACH, KW ;
STRANDNESS, DE .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1986, 4 (05) :450-456
[27]   SCREENING PATIENTS FOR RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - VALUE OF 3-DIMENSIONAL TIME-OF-FLIGHT MR-ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
LOUBEYRE, P ;
REVEL, D ;
GARCIA, P ;
DELIGNETTE, A ;
CANET, E ;
CHIROSSEL, P ;
GENIN, G ;
AMIEL, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (04) :847-852
[28]   CAPTOPRIL RENOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - ACCURACY AND LIMITATIONS [J].
MANN, SJ ;
PICKERING, TG ;
SOS, TA ;
UZZO, RG ;
SARKAR, S ;
FRIEND, K ;
RACKSON, ME ;
LARAGH, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 90 (01) :30-40
[29]  
MASSRY SG, 1989, TXB NEPHROLOGY, P139
[30]   INTRAARTERIAL DIGITAL SUBTRACTION IMAGING COST CONSIDERATIONS [J].
NORMAN, D ;
ULLOA, N ;
BRANTZAWADZKI, M ;
GOULD, RG .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 156 (01) :33-35