THE TOF-GUARD NEUROMUSCULAR-TRANSMISSION MONITOR - A COMPARISON WITH THE MYOGRAPH-2000

被引:61
作者
LOAN, PB [1 ]
PAXTON, LD [1 ]
MIRAKHUR, RK [1 ]
CONNOLLY, FM [1 ]
MCCOY, EP [1 ]
机构
[1] QUEENS UNIV BELFAST,DEPT ANAESTHET,BELFAST BT9 7BL,ANTRIM,NORTH IRELAND
关键词
MONITORING; NEUROMUSCULAR FUNCTION; ACCELEROGRAPHY; MECHANOMYOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; TOF-GUARD; MYOGRAPH; 2000;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06097.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The TOF-Guard neuromuscular monitor uses an accelerometer to measure the response to nerve stimulation. In this study, we have compared it to a standard mechanomyographic monitor, the Myograph 2000, for neuromuscular monitoring in 28 subjects. A train-of-four mode of stimulation was used in both cases. The times taken for onset of block, and for the recovery of T1 (the first response in the train of four) to 25% of control, the time from recovery of T1 from 25-75% and for the recovery of the train of four ratio to 0.7 were compared with the two monitors. There was a good correlation between the two devices for both onset and recovery times. However, differences were highlighted when the data were analysed by the method of Bland and Altman. The 95% limits of agreement for the T1 recovery to 25%, as measured by the TOF-Guard, ranged from 5 min less to 8 min more than when measured by the Myograph 2000. For recovery of the train of four ratio to 0.7, the limits of agreement were approximately 6 min in either direction. The 95% limits for the TOF-Guard measured train of four ratio were from 0.47 to 0.99, at the Myograph reading of 0.7. We recommend that information from the TOF-Guard and the Myograph 2000 should not be used interchangeably. However, the TOF-Guard is likely to improve considerably on tactile evaluation of the responses to stimulation.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 702
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]  
CROFTS SL, 1992, BRIT J HOSP MED, V48, P633
[3]   MONITORING NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCK BY ACCELEROMYOGRAPHY - COMPARISON OF THE MINI-ACCELOGRAPH WITH THE MYOGRAPH-2000 [J].
HARPER, NJN ;
MARTLEW, R ;
STRANG, T ;
WALLACE, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (04) :411-414
[4]  
JENSEN E, 1993, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V79, pA963
[5]  
KERN SE, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V78, P978
[6]   THE ACCELERATION TRANSDUCER - AN ASSESSMENT OF ITS PRECISION IN COMPARISON WITH A FORCE DISPLACEMENT TRANSDUCER [J].
MAY, O ;
NIELSEN, HK ;
WERNER, MU .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1988, 32 (03) :239-243
[7]   DOES PERIOPERATIVE TACTILE EVALUATION OF THE TRAIN-OF-4 RESPONSE INFLUENCE THE FREQUENCY OF POSTOPERATIVE RESIDUAL NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE [J].
PEDERSEN, T ;
VIBYMOGENSEN, J ;
BANG, U ;
OLSEN, NV ;
JENSEN, E ;
ENGBOEK, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (05) :835-839
[8]   POSTOPERATIVE RESIDUAL CURARIZATION - INCIDENCE, ETIOLOGY AND ASSOCIATED MORBIDITY [J].
SHORTEN, GD .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1993, 21 (06) :782-789
[9]  
SHORTEN GD, 1992, BRIT J ANAESTH, V68, pP438
[10]   ACCELOGRAPHIC TRAIN-OF-4 AT NEAR-THRESHOLD CURRENTS [J].
SILVERMAN, DG ;
CONNELLY, NR ;
OCONNOR, TZ ;
GARCIA, R ;
BRULL, SJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (01) :34-38