TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA FOR DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY - PROPOFOL INFUSION COMPARED TO THIOPENTONE COMBINED WITH MIDAZOLAM AND METHOHEXITONE INFUSION

被引：8

作者：

SONNE, NM ^{[1
]}

CLAUSEN, TG ^{[1
]}

VALENTIN, N ^{[1
]}

HALCK, S ^{[1
]}

MUNKSGAARD, A ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] GENTOFTE HOSP,DEPT ANESTHESIA,COPENHAGEN,DENMARK

来源：

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | 1992年 / 36卷 / 03期

关键词：

ANESTHETICS; INTRAVENOUS; PROPOFOL; THIOPENTONE; MIDAZOLAM; METHOHEXITONE; ALFENTANIL; HEMODYNAMICS; RECOVERY;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1399-6576.1992.tb03459.x

中图分类号：

R614 [麻醉学];

学科分类号：

100217 ;

摘要：

Total intravenous anaesthesia for direct laryngoscopy was investigated in 40 patients, randomized into four groups of 10 patients each. First, propofol infusion was compared to thiopentone combined with midazolam. Next, a comparison of propofol infusion with methohexitone infusion was undertaken. The propofol group showed significantly lower peroperative blood pressure compared to the thiopentone/midazolam group. The second propofol group required significantly less alfentanil to stabilize the blood pressure, compared to the methohexitone group. Completeness of recovery, assessed by means of a coin counting test, was faster in the propofol group compared to the thiopentone/midazolam group, while no difference could be demonstrated between the second propofol group and the methohexitone group. It is concluded that propofol seems to be superior to both thiopentone/midazolam and methohexitone with respect to the stability of peroperative blood pressure. Concerning recovery, propofol is superior to thiopentone/midazolam, but offers no advantage over methohexitone.

引用

页码：250 / 254

页数：5

共 20 条

[1] INDUCTION AND RECOVERY CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOFOL, THIOPENTAL AND ETOMIDATE [J].