REPRESENTATION IN AMERICAN NATIONAL CONVENTIONS - CASE OF 1972

[11] REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT IN EVOLUTION [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1932, 26 (02) : 223 - 240

[12] Beer S., 1965, BRIT POLITICS COLLEC

[13] Birch A., 1964, REPRESENTATIVE RESPO

[14] BIRCH AH, 1966, INT POLITICAL SCIENC

[15] BRODER DS, 1972, PARTYS OVER FAILURE

[16] BUCKLEY WJ, 1974, INT HERALD TRIB 0704

[17] BUDGE I, 1970, AGREEMENT STABILITY

[18] Burns James MacGregor, 1963, DEADLOCK DEMOCRACY 4

[19] Butler DavidA, 1960, AM BEHAV SCI, V4, P3

[20] CANTRIL H, 1941, PSYCHOLOGY SOCIAL MO, P74

[11] REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT IN EVOLUTION [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1932, 26 (02) : 223 - 240

[12] Beer S., 1965, BRIT POLITICS COLLEC

[13] Birch A., 1964, REPRESENTATIVE RESPO

[14] BIRCH AH, 1966, INT POLITICAL SCIENC

[15] BRODER DS, 1972, PARTYS OVER FAILURE

[16] BUCKLEY WJ, 1974, INT HERALD TRIB 0704

[17] BUDGE I, 1970, AGREEMENT STABILITY

[18] Burns James MacGregor, 1963, DEADLOCK DEMOCRACY 4

[19] Butler DavidA, 1960, AM BEHAV SCI, V4, P3

[20] CANTRIL H, 1941, PSYCHOLOGY SOCIAL MO, P74