THE H-REFLEX TO MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF LOWER-LIMB NERVES

被引:26
作者
ZHU, Y
STARR, A
SU, SH
WOODWARD, G
HALDEMAN, S
机构
[1] Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archneur.1992.00530250070018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We elicited H-reflexes by magnetic and electrical stimulation of several different nerves in 10 healthy subjects and two patients with S-1 radiculopathy. The posterior tibial nerve at the popliteal fossa and the femoral nerve at the inguinal ligament were tested with both electrical and magnetic stimulation; the proximal sciatic nerve was tested only with magnetic stimulation. Muscle activity was recorded from the soleus muscle for posterior tibial and sciatic nerve stimulation and from the vastus medialis muscle for femoral nerve stimulation. No significant difference was found between the latency of H-reflexes evoked by magnetic or electrical stimulation. With magnetic stimulation, the mean (+/- SD) la sensory fiber conduction velocity in the proximal segment of the sciatic nerve was 72.4 +/- 3.3 m/s, while the motor nerve fiber conduction velocity in the same portion of the nerve was significantly slower, at 60.6 +/- 2.0 m/s. In two patients with unilateral S-1 radiculopathy, the latency of the H-reflex from the soleus muscle to both magnetic and electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve was absent or prolonged on the affected side. Magnetic stimulation can be used to study the H-reflex and la fiber conduction velocity and is particularly advantageous when testing deeply located nerve trunks.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 71
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   FOCAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN PERIPHERAL-NERVE WITH THE MAGNETIC COIL - A COMPARISON WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
AMASSIAN, VE ;
MACCABEE, PJ ;
CRACCO, RQ .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1989, 103 (03) :282-289
[2]  
BATIEN N, 1974, REV ELECTROENCEPHALO, V4, P587
[3]   CLINICAL USE OF THE MAGNETIC STIMULATOR IN THE INVESTIGATION OF PERIPHERAL CONDUCTION TIME [J].
BRITTON, TC ;
MEYER, BU ;
HERDMANN, J ;
BENECKE, R .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 1990, 13 (05) :396-406
[4]   SOMATOSENSORY CEREBRAL POTENTIAL AND H REFLEX AFTER ACUTE SPINAL-CORD LESIONS [J].
CADILHAC, J ;
GEORGESCO, M ;
BENEZECH, J ;
DUDAY, H ;
DAPRES, G .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 43 (02) :160-167
[5]  
CADWELL J, 1987, INSTRUCTION MANUAL M
[6]  
CHOKROVERTY S, 1990, MAGNETIC STIMULATION, P249
[7]   THE INFLUENCE OF STIMULUS TYPE ON THE MAGNETIC EXCITATION OF NERVE STRUCTURES [J].
CLAUS, D ;
MURRAY, NMF ;
SPITZER, A ;
FLUGEL, D .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 75 (04) :342-349
[8]   CERVICAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION [J].
CROS, D ;
CHIAPPA, KH ;
GOMINAK, S ;
FANG, J ;
SANTAMARIA, J ;
KING, PJ ;
SHAHANI, BT .
NEUROLOGY, 1990, 40 (11) :1751-1756
[9]  
DELWAIDE PJ, 1980, SPASTICITY DISORDERE, P345
[10]   THE UTILITY OF MAGNETIC STIMULATION FOR ROUTINE PERIPHERAL-NERVE CONDUCTION STUDIES [J].
EVANS, BA ;
LITCHY, WJ ;
DAUBE, JR .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 1988, 11 (10) :1074-1078