COMPARISON OF INITIAL DETECTION AND REDETECTION OF VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION IN A TRANSVENOUS DEFIBRILLATOR SYSTEM WITH AUTOMATIC GAIN-CONTROL

被引:24
作者
BERUL, CI [1 ]
CALLANS, DJ [1 ]
SCHWARTZMAN, DS [1 ]
PREMINGER, MW [1 ]
GOTTLIEB, CD [1 ]
MARCHLINSKI, FE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV PENN,PRESBYTERIAN MED CTR,PHILADELPHIA HEART INST,CLIN ELECTROPHYSIOL LAB,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0735-1097(94)00418-P
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate postshock redetection of ventricular fibrillation by a system that coupled an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with an automatic gain control sense amplifier and a transvenous lead system. Background. Redetection of ventricular fibrillation after an unsuccessful first shock has not been systematically evaluated. Previous studies base suggested that sensing performance of some lead systems may be adversely affected by the delivery of subthreshold shocks. Methods. The time required for both initial detection and redetection of ventricular fibrillation was compared in 22 patients. These times were estimated by subtracting the capacitor charge time from the total event time. Results. A total of 113 successful and 57 unsuccessful initial shocks were delivered during induced ventricular fibrillation. The mean +/- SD initial time to detection of ventricular fibrillation was 5.5 +/- 1.7 s (range 2.4 to 10.8); the time to redetection ranged from 1.5 to 18.5 s (mean 4.5 +/- 2.8, p = NS vs. detection time). Abnormal redetection episodes, defined as a redetection time >10.2 s (i.e., >2 SD above the mean redetection time), were observed in 4 (18%) of 22 patients. Conclusions. Redetection of ventricular fibrillation after a subthreshold first shock mag be delayed. Device testing with intentional delivery of subthreshold shocks to verify successful postshock redetection of ventricular fibrillation should be performed routinely in all patients.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 436
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [11] ISBRUCH F, 1991, European Heart Journal, V12, P363
  • [12] ISBRUCH F, 1992, PACE, V15, P562
  • [13] RESPONSE OF CULTURED MYOCARDIAL-CELLS TO COUNTERSHOCK-TYPE ELECTRIC-FIELD STIMULATION
    JONES, JL
    LEPESCHKIN, E
    JONES, RE
    RUSH, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 235 (02): : H214 - H222
  • [14] JORDAENS L, 1993, BRIT HEART J, V69, P14
  • [15] FAILURE OF AN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR TO REDETECT VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH A NONTHORACOTOMY LEAD SYSTEM
    JUNG, W
    MANZ, M
    MOOSDORF, R
    LUDERITZ, B
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1992, 86 (04) : 1217 - 1222
  • [16] JUNG W, 1993, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V21, pA126
  • [17] Defibrillation Shocks Produce Different Effects on Purkinje Fibers and Ventricular Muscle: Implications for Successful Defibrillation, Refbrillation and Postshock Arrhythmia
    Li, Huagui G.
    Jones, Douglas L.
    Yee, Raymond
    Klein, George J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 22 (02) : 607 - 614
  • [18] RELATION OF THE INTRAOPERATIVE DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD TO SUCCESSFUL POSTOPERATIVE DEFIBRILLATION WITH AN AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
    MARCHLINSKI, FE
    FLORES, B
    MILLER, JM
    GOTTLIEB, CD
    HARGROVE, WC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 62 (07) : 393 - 398
  • [19] AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR IMPLANTATION WITHOUT THORACOTOMY USING AN ENDOCARDIAL AND SUBMUSCULAR PATCH SYSTEM
    MCCOWAN, R
    MALONEY, J
    WILKOFF, B
    SIMMONS, T
    KHOURY, D
    MCALISTER, H
    MORANT, V
    CASTLE, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (02) : 415 - 421
  • [20] IMPLANTATION OF A CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR WITHOUT THORACOTOMY USING A TRIPLE ELECTRODE SYSTEM
    SAKSENA, S
    PARSONNET, V
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 259 (01): : 69 - 72