EFFICACY OF DIAZEPAM AND MEPERIDINE IN AMBULATORY PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPY - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL

被引:19
作者
BAHALOMARA, N
NAHATA, MC
MURRAY, RD
LINSCHEID, TR
WILLIAMS, T
HEITLINGER, LA
LI, BUK
MCCLUNG, HJ
LININGER, B
机构
[1] OHIO STATE UNIV,COLL PHARM,WEXNER INST PEDIAT RES,500 W 12 AVE,COLUMBUS,OH 43210
[2] OHIO STATE UNIV,COLL MED,COLUMBUS,OH 43210
[3] CHILDRENS HOSP,COLUMBUS,OH 43205
关键词
MEPERIDINE; DIAZEPAM; ENDOSCOPY; SEDATION;
D O I
10.1097/00005176-199305000-00007
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Medications are routinely administered to children prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of four dosage regimens: meperidine 2 mg/kg (M); low-dose meperdine 1 mg/kg and diazepam 0.1 mg/kg (M low + D); high-dose meperidine 2 mg/kg and diazepam 0.1 mg/kg (M high + D); and, diazepam 0.1 mg/kg (D) in a randomized, double-blind trial in 71 pediatric patients (ages 1 to 19 years). Cooperation, emotional state, and sedation were rated. The frequency of negative behavior demonstration (i.e., crying, gagging, flailing, nervous behavior) indicating ineffective or inadequate sedation was recorded before, during, and after the procedure, Vital signs and oxygen saturation were noted. Significant differences were observed in the efficacy of the various sedation regimens. Overall, the physicians and nurses rated M most effective in children <11 years. In these children, M high + D and D were rated least effective by the nurses, whereas physicians felt that D was least effective. In the older children, M, M low + D, and M high + D were rated similarly effective by physicians and nurses, and D was rated least effective. In both age groups, the lowest incidence of negative behaviors during the endoscopy procedure occurred in patients who received M. Combinations of D and M + D resulted in an increased incidence of negative behaviors; thus, M may be the preferred sedation regimen in children undergoing endoscopy. The addition of diazepam to meperidine may be detrimental in terms of eliciting negative behaviors.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 392
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[2]   RANDOMIZED STUDY OF PREMEDICATION FOR ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS [J].
FIGUEROACOLON, R ;
GRUNOW, JE .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1988, 7 (03) :359-366
[3]  
GILVARRY JM, 1990, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V4, P423
[4]  
GRAEF JW, 1988, MANUAL PEDIATRIC THE, P1
[5]  
GREENE MA, 1991, HARRIET LANE HDB MAN, P261
[6]   BEHAVIORAL DISTRESS IN CHILDREN WITH CANCER UNDERGOING MEDICAL PROCEDURES - DEVELOPMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
KATZ, ER ;
KELLERMAN, J ;
SIEGEL, SE .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 48 (03) :356-365
[7]   SEDATION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM [J].
LEE, MG ;
HANNA, W ;
HARDING, H .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (02) :82-84
[8]   A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM FOR SEDATION IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
MAGNI, VC ;
FROST, RA ;
LEUNG, JWC ;
COTTON, PB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1983, 55 (11) :1095-1101
[9]   SEDATION IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS UNDERGOING DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES [J].
NAHATA, MC .
DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY, 1988, 22 (09) :711-715
[10]   EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A DIAZEPAM AND MEPERIDINE COMBINATION FOR PEDIATRIC GASTROINTESTINAL PROCEDURES [J].
NAHATA, MC ;
MURRAY, RD ;
ZINGARELLI, J ;
LI, BUK ;
MCCLUNG, HJ ;
LININGER, B .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1990, 10 (03) :335-338