QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENTS AND LEVELS OF DECISION-MAKING - DIFFERENTIATING OBJECTIVES

被引:37
作者
SUTHERLAND, HJ
TILL, JE
机构
[1] UNIV TORONTO,CTR BIOETH,TORONTO M5S 1A1,ONTARIO,CANADA
[2] UNIV TORONTO,DEPT MED BIOPHYS,TORONTO M5S 1A1,ONTARIO,CANADA
关键词
DECISION MAKING; PREFERENCES; HEALTH PROFILES; UTILITY MEASUREMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/BF00434801
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to examine uses of quality of life (QOL) measurements at different levels of decision making within the health care system, ranging from the micro (clinical) level, through the meso (agency, institutional or regional) level to the macro and meta (governmental) levels. We use individualized, group and population-based QOL and preference assessments as illustrative examples of ways in which QOL information and decision making level interact. We conclude that the meso and macro levels pose particularly challenging problems, and suggest that, if the primary emphasis is placed on applications of QOL assessments at the micro (clinical) level of decision making, a research agenda that is much too limited may be adopted.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 303
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]  
SUTHERLAND HJ, 1992, OCT INT C PSYCH ONC
[32]  
THORNE JI, 1992, RATIONING AM MED CAR, P24
[33]  
Till J E, 1992, Qual Life Res, V1, P31, DOI 10.1007/BF00435433
[34]   UTILITY APPROACH TO MEASURING HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE [J].
TORRANCE, GW .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (06) :593-600
[35]  
VEATCH RM, 1992, RATIONING AM MED CAR, P78
[36]   THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .1. CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION [J].
WARE, JE ;
SHERBOURNE, CD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (06) :473-483
[37]  
[No title captured]