ERRORS IN INHALABLE DUST SAMPLING FOR PARTICLES EXCEEDING 100 MU-M

被引:15
作者
LIDEN, G [1 ]
KENNY, LC [1 ]
机构
[1] HLTH & SAFETY EXECUT,OCCUPAT HYG & MED LAB,SHEFFIELD S3 7HQ,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1093/annhyg/38.4.373
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The sampling convention for inhalable dust (inhalability), proposed by the Comite Eurupeen de Normalisation and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; is undefined for particle sizes larger than 100 mu m owing to experimental difficulties in its measurement. This paper estimates lower and upper envelopes for the inhalability of these larger particles, for the low air velocities predominating in indoor work places. Estimates of the inhalable aerosol mass of particles exceeding 100 mu m are then obtained for the workplace particle size distributions published in the literature. For the reported workplace aerosol size distributions, it is generally found that where the mass median aerodynamic diameter is smaller than 25 mu m the inhalable mass above 100 mu m is negligible. Limitations in the applicability of the laboratory-determined inhalable convention to workplace sampling situations are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 384
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]  
KUO TL, 1993, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
[12]   A NEW PERSONAL SAMPLER FOR AIRBORNE TOTAL DUST IN WORKPLACES [J].
MARK, D ;
VINCENT, JH .
ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1986, 30 (01) :89-&
[13]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INHALABLE DUST SPECTROMETER [J].
MARK, D ;
VINCENT, JH ;
GIBSON, H ;
AITKEN, RJ ;
LYNCH, G .
ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1984, 28 (01) :125-143
[14]  
MARK D, 1988, TM8802 I OCC MED REP
[15]  
PUSKAR MA, 1991, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V52, P280, DOI 10.1202/0002-8894(1991)052<0280:IWLOPD>2.0.CO
[16]  
2
[17]  
RODES CE, 1994, IN PRESS ATMOS ENV
[18]  
RUBOW KL, 1987, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V48, P532, DOI 10.1202/0002-8894(1987)048<0532:APCIDE>2.0.CO
[19]  
2
[20]   FIELD COMPARISON OF PERSONAL SAMPLERS FOR INHALABLE DUST [J].
VAUGHAN, NP ;
CHALMERS, CP ;
BOTHAM, RA .
ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1990, 34 (06) :553-573