INTERCOMPARISON OF TROPOSPHERIC OZONE PROFILES OBTAINED BY ELECTROCHEMICAL SONDES, A GROUND-BASED LIDAR AND AN AIRBORNE UV-PHOTOMETER

被引:34
作者
BEEKMANN, M
ANCELLET, G
MARTIN, D
ABONNEL, C
DUVERNEUIL, G
EIDELMAN, F
BESSEMOULIN, P
FRITZ, N
GIZARD, E
机构
[1] METEOFRANCE,CNRM,CAM,F-91208 BRETIGNY SUR ORGE,FRANCE
[2] METEOFRANCE,CNRM,GMEI,F-31057 TOULOUSE,FRANCE
关键词
OZONE MEASUREMENT; INTERCOMPARISON; ELECTROCHEMICAL SONDES; LIDAR; AIRBORNE UV-PHOTOMETER;
D O I
10.1016/1352-2310(94)00336-J
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Eight simultaneous tropospheric ozone profiles have been recorded during an intercomparison campaign at Observatoire de Haute Provence in Southern France from 23 March 1991 to 3 April 1991. The participating instruments were electrochemical sondes of ECC type (Meteo France, CNRM/GMEI), of Brewer-Mast type (Service d'Aeronomie, CNRS), a ground-based UV-DIAL lidar (Service d'Aeronomie, CNRS) and an airborne UV-photometer (Meteo France, CNRM/CAM). Averaged over a 4.5-8 km height range, the biases derived with respect to the median ozone concentration of the four instruments are + 25 +/- 3% for ECC sondes, - 1 +/- 3% for Brewer-Mast sondes, - 3 +/- 2% for the airborne UV-photometer and - 7 +/- 2% for the lidar. Applying the Dobson normalisation to ECC sondes, its bias is reduced to + 18%, part of which (up to 7%) may be explained by an incorrect estimation of the background current evolution following the standard procedure recommended for ECC sondes (Vaisala, OES 11 Ozonesonde User's Guide, 1988). The precision derived from the results of this campaign is 10% for ECC sondes, 9% for Brewer-Mast sondes, 5% for the UV-photometer and 5% for the lidar in the troposphere. These results are compared to that of previous intercomparison campaigns and discussed with respect to possible measurement errors related to the different instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1042
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ANCELLET G, 1989, J ATMOS OPT TECH, V6, P832
[2]   ELECTROCHEMICAL CONCENTRATION CELL OZONESONDE ACCURACY AND PRECISION [J].
BARNES, RA ;
BANDY, AR ;
TORRES, AL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1985, 90 (ND5) :7881-7887
[3]  
Bass AM, 1985, ATMOSPHERIC OZONE, P606, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-5313-0_120
[4]   INTERCOMPARISON CAMPAIGN OF VERTICAL OZONE PROFILES INCLUDING ELECTROCHEMICAL SONDES OF ECC AND BREWER-MAST TYPE-A GROUND-BASED UV-DIFFERENTIAL ABSORPTION LIDAR [J].
BEEKMANN, M ;
ANCELLET, G ;
MEGIE, G ;
SMIT, HGJ ;
KLEY, D .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 1994, 19 (03) :259-288
[5]  
BEEKMANN M, 1992, THESIS U PARIS 6 PAR
[6]   THE OXFORD-KEW OZONE SONDE [J].
BREWER, AW ;
MILFORD, JR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1960, 256 (1287) :470-495
[7]  
CHEDIN A, 1985, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V24, P2
[8]  
CLAUDE H, 1987, WMO17 GLOB RES MON P, P1
[9]  
DEMUER D, 1980, 1980 P QUADR OZ S, P88
[10]   RESULTS FROM THE BALLOON OZONE INTERCOMPARISON CAMPAIGN (BOIC) [J].
HILSENRATH, E ;
ATTMANNSPACHER, W ;
BASS, A ;
EVANS, W ;
HAGEMEYER, R ;
BARNES, RA ;
KOMHYR, W ;
MAUERSBERGER, K ;
MENTALL, J ;
PROFFITT, M ;
ROBBINS, D ;
TAYLOR, S ;
TORRES, A ;
WEINSTOCK, E .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1986, 91 (D12) :3137-3152