A LABORATORY EVALUATION OF EKTASPEED PLUS DENTAL-X-RAY FILM

被引:10
作者
HORNER, K
RUSHTON, VE
SHEARER, AC
机构
[1] Turner Dental School, Manchester University
关键词
DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY; X-RAY FILMS;
D O I
10.1016/0300-5712(94)00018-B
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to make a laboratory evaluation of the image quality of a new dental X-ray film, Ektaspeed Plus, compared with Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films. Methods: Films of each emulsion type underwent a range of exposures at both 50 kVp and 70 kVp, and characteristic curves were constructed to give a comparison of fog, speed and contrast. Line pair and contrast detail test objects were used to assess the resolution of radiographs and the ability of the two film types to reproduce minor differences in subject contrast. The sensitivity of the emulsions to safelighting for a range of times was also tested. Results: Ektaspeed Plus had the same speed, a slightly higher base plus fog density but a higher contrast (50 and 70 kVp) than Ektaspeed. The speed of Ektaspeed Plus was higher and the contrast similar to that of Ultraspeed film. Limiting resolutions of the three films were the same. There was a slightly better imaging of one contrast detail phantom with Ektaspeed Plus compared to Ektaspeed at 70 kVp only. All three emulsions were insensitive to recommended safelighting conditions. Conclusion: The improved image contrast of Ektaspeed Plus may be more acceptable to dentists than Ektaspeed and lead to a greater acceptance of E-speed film, contributing to dose reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 363
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Boere G, 1990, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V19, P49
[2]  
CATADANDELLAFLE.J, 1983, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V63, P94
[3]   AN EVALUATION OF KODAK EKTASPEED PERIAPICAL FILM FOR USE IN ENDODONTICS [J].
GIRSCH, WJ ;
MATTESON, SR ;
MCKEE, MN .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1983, 9 (07) :282-288
[4]   SURVEY OF RADIOLOGIC PRACTICES AMONG DENTAL PRACTITIONERS [J].
GOREN, AD ;
SCIUBBA, JJ ;
FRIEDMAN, R ;
MALAMUD, H .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1989, 67 (04) :464-468
[5]  
HEWITT JM, 1989, RAD PROTECTION THEOR, P83
[6]   USE OF RAPID PROCESSING TECHNIQUES BY A SAMPLE OF BRITISH DENTISTS [J].
HORNER, K ;
SHEARER, AC ;
RUSHTON, VE ;
CZAJKA, J .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 22 (03) :145-148
[7]   DOSE REDUCTION IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
HORNER, K ;
HIRSCHMANN, PN .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1990, 18 (04) :171-184
[8]   2 DENTAL-X-RAY FILMS COMPARED FOR RATER PREFERENCE USING ENDODONTIC VIEWS [J].
KLEIER, DJ ;
BENNER, SJ ;
AVERBACH, RE .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1985, 59 (02) :201-205
[9]  
MANSON-HING L R, 1962, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, V15, P173, DOI 10.1016/0030-4220(62)90005-1
[10]   COMPLIANCE OF MICHIGAN DENTISTS WITH RADIOGRAPHIC SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS [J].
NAKFOOR, CA ;
BROOKS, SL .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1992, 73 (04) :510-513