CINE PHASE-CONTRAST MR FLOW MEASUREMENTS - IMPROVED PRECISION USING AN AUTOMATED-METHOD OF VESSEL DETECTION

被引:36
作者
BURKART, DJ [1 ]
FELMLEE, JP [1 ]
JOHNSON, CD [1 ]
WOLF, RL [1 ]
WEAVER, AL [1 ]
EHMAN, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN, DEPT BIOSTAT, ROCHESTER, MN 55905 USA
关键词
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CINE; TECHNIQUES; FLOW; MEASUREMENTS;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-199405000-00023
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to construct a method of vessel edge detection that correctly identifies vessel pixels and to compare the interuser variability of cine phase contrast MR volumetric flow rates obtained with the conventional manual method and an automated method. Materials and Methods: The automated method was developed based on a magnitude image threshold value and compared with the manual method in a flow phantom (three users) and in velocity images of the portal vein (five users). The threshold value determined from the magnitude image was applied to a region of interest surrounding the vessel of interest on the magnitude image to construct a vessel edge detection mask m(x,y). The velocity images were then multiplied by the mask m(x,y) and volumetric flow rates determined using the identified vessel pixels. Results: In the flow phantom, flow measurements with the magnitude threshold method had significantly less interuser variability compared with the manual method (p < 0.01) and were within 10% (mean 6.0%) of the actual flow versus 35% (mean 18.6%) with the manual method. Regarding flow measurements in the portal vein of six volunteers, the magnitude threshold method was significantly more precise (p < 0.01) than the manual method with a mean standard deviation between the five users of 40.4 +/- 12.9 ml/min (range 22-60 ml/min) and 110.4 +/- 32.7 ml/min (range 70-155 ml/min), respectively. Conclusion: The magnitude threshold method of vessel edge detection developed in this study yields flow measurements that are accurate in the model system and have significantly less interuser variability than the manual method. This method shows promise for improving the precision of cine phase contrast flow measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 475
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] BLOOD-FLOW EFFECTS IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    AXEL, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1984, 143 (06) : 1157 - 1166
  • [2] STATUS OF CLINICAL MR EVALUATIONS 1985-1988 - BASE-LINE AND DESIGN FOR FURTHER ASSESSMENTS
    BEAM, CA
    SOSTMAN, HD
    ZHENG, JY
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 180 (01) : 265 - 270
  • [3] VOLUMETRIC FLOW-RATES IN THE PORTAL VENOUS SYSTEM - MEASUREMENT WITH CINE PHASE-CONTRAST MR IMAGING
    BURKART, DJ
    JOHNSON, CD
    MORTON, MJ
    WOLF, RL
    EHMAN, RL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (05) : 1113 - 1118
  • [4] RIGHT AND LEFT LUNG PERFUSION - INVITRO AND INVIVO VALIDATION WITH OBLIQUE-ANGLE, VELOCITY-ENCODED CINE MR IMAGING
    CAPUTO, GR
    KONDO, C
    MASUI, T
    GERACI, SJ
    FOSTER, E
    OSULLIVAN, MM
    HIGGINS, CB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 180 (03) : 693 - 698
  • [5] SEVERITY OF AORTIC REGURGITATION - INTERSTUDY REPRODUCIBILITY OF MEASUREMENTS WITH VELOCITY-ENCODED CINE MR-IMAGING
    DULCE, MC
    MOSTBECK, GH
    OSULLIVAN, M
    CHEITLIN, M
    CAPUTO, GR
    HIGGINS, CB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (01) : 235 - 240
  • [6] INVIVO VALIDATION OF MR VELOCITY IMAGING
    FIRMIN, DN
    NAYLER, GL
    KLIPSTEIN, RH
    UNDERWOOD, SR
    REES, RSO
    LONGMORE, DB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1987, 11 (05) : 751 - 756
  • [7] Glover G H, 1988, Magn Reson Annu, P299
  • [8] DETECTION OF SEA-WATER MOTION BY NUCLEAR PRECESSION
    HAHN, EL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1960, 65 (02): : 776 - 777
  • [9] RIGHT AND LEFT-VENTRICULAR STROKE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS WITH VELOCITY-ENCODED CINE MR IMAGING - INVITRO AND INVIVO VALIDATION
    KONDO, C
    CAPUTO, GR
    SEMELKA, R
    FOSTER, E
    SHIMAKAWA, A
    HIGGINS, CB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 157 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [10] INTEROBSERVER VARIATION IN THE INTERPRETATION OF ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHS
    MARKUS, JB
    SOMERS, S
    FRANIC, SE
    MOOLA, C
    STEVENSON, GW
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (01) : 69 - 71