ADVERSE LEARNING-STRATEGY - THE ADELAIDE DIAGNOSTIC LEARNING INVENTORY AND ITS SUBSCALE REPLICABILITY IN A MEDICAL-STUDENT POPULATION

被引:4
作者
WELCH, G [1 ]
PEARCE, K [1 ]
LEWIS, M [1 ]
MELLSOP, G [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV OTAGO,WELLINGTON SCH MED,DUNEDIN,NEW ZEALAND
关键词
*learning; *psychological tests; medical/*psychol; psychometrics; questionnaires; students;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02509.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Summary: Summary. The Adelaide Diagnostic Learning Inventory (ADLIMS) is a measure of learning styles and learning pathologies that was designed to investigate the impact of traditional approaches to learning versus problem‐based learning and to identify students whose approach to learning tasks predicted poor academic performance. In this study, some important psychometric properties of the ADLIMS were examined, including its factor structure. In this study, factor replicability across samples was argued to provide a more robust and psychologically meaningful factor solution than that which can be obtained using traditional mathematical criteria. The results of the factor analysis did not confirm the presence of the four factor solution earlier reported for the ADLIMS, but did identify three clear factors that had very high replicability. An inspection of the items comprising these three factors showed that factor 1 tapped subjective distress related to poor study habits, lack of motivation to study, and distraction from social activities. Factor 2 tapped distress arising from high achievement expectations that were hampered by superficial or disorganized study habits that did not enable the student to grasp the relationships between concepts and ideas. Factor 3 tapped positive feelings and a sense of satisfaction associated with a problem‐based approach to the learning of new study material. Although the internal reliability of the ADLIMS subscales met the requirements of a measure to be used in general research such as in the investigation of correlates among groups of medical students, they did not meet the higher requirements of a measure to be used to identify or predict individuals with pathological learning styles. 1990 Blackwell Publishing
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 123
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[2]   FACTOR MATCHING PROCEDURES - AN IMPROVEMENT OF S INDEX - WITH TABLES [J].
CATTELL, RB ;
BALCAR, KR ;
HORN, JL ;
NESSELRO.JR .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1969, 29 (04) :781-&
[3]   LEARNING STYLES AND APPROACHES - IMPLICATIONS FOR MEDICAL-EDUCATION [J].
NEWBLE, DI ;
ENTWISTLE, NJ .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1986, 20 (03) :162-175
[4]   TOWARDS THE IDENTIFICATION OF STUDENT LEARNING-PROBLEMS - THE DEVELOPMENT OF A DIAGNOSTIC INVENTORY [J].
NEWBLE, DI ;
ENTWISTLE, NJ ;
HEJKA, EJ ;
JOLLY, BC ;
WHELAN, G .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1988, 22 (06) :518-526
[5]  
Nunnally J.C., 1975, HDB EVALUATION RES, V1
[6]  
SHROUT PE, 1981, WHAT IS CASE
[7]   AN EXAMINATION OF REPORTED FACTOR STRUCTURES OF THE GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF A STABLE REPLICABLE STRUCTURE [J].
SIEGERT, RJ ;
MCCORMICK, IA ;
TAYLOR, AJW ;
WALKEY, FH .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 39 (01) :89-100
[8]   MULTIPLE REPLICATION OF FACTOR STRUCTURE - A LOGICAL SOLUTION FOR A NUMBER OF FACTORS PROBLEM [J].
WALKEY, FH ;
MCCORMICK, IA .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1985, 20 (01) :57-67
[9]  
WALKEY FH, 1983, VICTORIA U WELLINGTO, V29
[10]  
WALKEY FH, 1987, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V15, P213