Product market competition and corporate investment decisions

被引:78
作者
Laksmana, Indrarini [1 ]
Yang, Ya-wen [2 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Dept Accounting, Accounting, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Business, Accounting, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
关键词
Over-investment; Product market competition;
D O I
10.1108/RAF-11-2013-0123
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The study aims to examine the association between product market competition and corporate investment decisions on, particularly, risk-taking and investment efficiency. Existing theoretical studies on whether product market competition mitigates or exacerbates agency problems are inconclusive. Prior research generally finds that competition constrains management opportunism in reporting operating performance. However, the association between product market competition and managerial investment decisions has largely been unexplored. Design/methodology/approach - The primary measure of product market competition is the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. The authors use regression analysis to examine the association between corporate risk-taking and over-investment of free cash flow (FCF) (as dependent variables) and product market competition (as an independent variable). Findings - Using firm-year observations from 1990 to 2010, the authors find that competition encourages managers to invest in risky investment. They also find that competition disciplines management on its use of FCFs. Overall, their results provide support for the disciplining role of product market competition in management investment decisions. The results are robust after they control for shareholder activism and executive compensations. Originality/value - The paper contributes to the literature by providing evidence of the disciplining role of product market competition in management investment decisions. First, the results suggest that competition encourages managers to invest in risky investment. One potential explanation for the results is that competition reduces opportunities for resource diversion for management personal benefits and, in turn, decreases management risk aversion. Another explanation is that competition forces management to take more risks for the long-term survival of the company. Second, the results indicate that competition disciplines management on its use of FCFs. Although firms in highly competitive industries make investment decisions that are less conservative, they tend to avoid suboptimal investment decisions, such as over-investment of FCF, compared to their counterparts.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   RISK, RETURN, AND EQUILIBRIUM - EMPIRICAL TESTS [J].
FAMA, EF ;
MACBETH, JD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :607-636
[12]   AGENCY PROBLEMS AND THE THEORY OF THE FIRM [J].
FAMA, EF .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1980, 88 (02) :288-307
[13]   SEPARATION OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL [J].
FAMA, EF ;
JENSEN, MC .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1983, 26 (02) :301-325
[14]   Management turnover and product market competition: Empirical evidence from the US newspaper industry [J].
Fee, CE ;
Hadlock, CJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2000, 73 (02) :205-243
[15]   Paying for observable luck [J].
Feriozzi, Fabio .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2011, 42 (02) :387-415
[16]   Corporate governance and equity prices [J].
Gompers, P ;
Ishii, J ;
Metrick, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (01) :107-155
[17]   THE MARKET MECHANISM AS AN INCENTIVE SCHEME [J].
HART, OD .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1983, 14 (02) :366-382
[18]   MANAGERIAL CONSERVATISM, PROJECT CHOICE, AND DEBT [J].
HIRSHLEIFER, D ;
THAKOR, AV .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1992, 5 (03) :437-470
[19]   COMPETITION, LONG-RUN CONTRACTS AND INTERNAL INEFFICIENCIES IN FIRMS [J].
HORN, H ;
LANG, H ;
LUNDGREN, S .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1994, 38 (02) :213-233
[20]   Industry concentration and average stock returns [J].
Hou, Kewei ;
Robinson, David T. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (04) :1927-1956