EFFECTS OF FILTER QUESTIONS IN PUBLIC-OPINION SURVEYS

[1] PSEUDO-OPINIONS ON PUBLIC AFFAIRS [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1980, 44 (02) : 198 - 209

[2] EFFECTS OF PRESENTING ONE VERSUS 2 SIDES OF AN ISSUE IN SURVEY QUESTIONS [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1982, 46 (01) : 69 - 85

[3] CAMPBELL A, 1960, AM NATIONAL ELECTION

[4] Converse Philip E., 1964, QUANTITATIVE ANAL SO, P206

[5] Converse PhilipE., 1970, QUANTITATIVE ANAL SO, P168

[6] COOMBS CH, 1977, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V40, P497

[7] *CTR POL STUD, 1970, 7298 AM NAT EL STUD

[8] CHARACTERISTICS OF NON-OPINION AND NO OPINION RESPONSE GROUPS [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1978, 42 (04) : 533 - 543

[9] RANDOM DIGIT DIALING - COMPARISON TO PERSONAL SURVEYS [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1978, 42 (01) : 105 - 114

[10] *POL BEH PROGR SUR, 1964, 7235 AM NAT EL STUD

[1] PSEUDO-OPINIONS ON PUBLIC AFFAIRS [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1980, 44 (02) : 198 - 209

[2] EFFECTS OF PRESENTING ONE VERSUS 2 SIDES OF AN ISSUE IN SURVEY QUESTIONS [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1982, 46 (01) : 69 - 85

[3] CAMPBELL A, 1960, AM NATIONAL ELECTION

[4] Converse Philip E., 1964, QUANTITATIVE ANAL SO, P206

[5] Converse PhilipE., 1970, QUANTITATIVE ANAL SO, P168

[6] COOMBS CH, 1977, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V40, P497

[7] *CTR POL STUD, 1970, 7298 AM NAT EL STUD

[8] CHARACTERISTICS OF NON-OPINION AND NO OPINION RESPONSE GROUPS [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1978, 42 (04) : 533 - 543

[9] RANDOM DIGIT DIALING - COMPARISON TO PERSONAL SURVEYS [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1978, 42 (01) : 105 - 114

[10] *POL BEH PROGR SUR, 1964, 7235 AM NAT EL STUD