A NEW RELATIONSHIP FOR RAREFACTION

被引:42
作者
BREWER, A [1 ]
WILLIAMSON, M [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV YORK,DEPT BIOL,YORK YO1 5DD,N YORKSHIRE,ENGLAND
关键词
RAREFACTION; DIVERSITY INDEXES; COLEMAN FUNCTION; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/BF00056509
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
All diversity indices are functions of the vector of the numbers of individuals in different species in a statistical population. So they are also functions of the number of species. It is well known, from the species-area curve and from collector's curves, that the number of species is a function of sampling effort. The rarefaction and Coleman functions are both functions that allow comparisons to be made at the same number of individuals, but have different mathematical forms. We show that the numerical difference between them, in the samples we have studied, is negligibly small. We show how to modify the Coleman function to allow for sampling without replacement, and show that the modified function is identical to the hypergeometric rarefaction function. Rarefaction should always be used, with any index, when comparing diversity in different size samples, but the number of species is the preferred index. Suggestions for comparing rarefaction curves from different samples are made.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 379
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [11] Kempton R.A., The structure of species abundance and measurement of diversity, Biometrics, 35, pp. 307-21, (1979)
  • [12] Raup D.M., Taxonomic diversity estimation using rarefaction, Paleobiology, 1, pp. 333-42, (1975)
  • [13] Sanders H.L., Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study, The American Naturalist, 102, pp. 243-82, (1968)
  • [14] Siegel A.F., Rarefaction curves, Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, pp. 623-6, (1990)
  • [15] Siegel A.F., German R.Z., Rarefaction and taxonomic diversity, Biometrics, 38, pp. 235-41, (1982)
  • [16] Smith W., Grassle J.F., Sampling properties of a family of diversity measures, Biometrics, 33, pp. 283-92, (1977)
  • [17] Tipper J.C., Rarefaction and rarefiction—the use and abuse of a method in paleoecology, Paleobiology, 5, pp. 423-34, (1979)
  • [18] Williaon M., Relationship of species number to area, distance and other variables, Analytical Biogeography, pp. 91-115, (1988)