CUSTOM-MADE CAPSULES AND SUPPOSITORIES OF METHADONE FOR PATIENTS ON HIGH-DOSE OPIOIDS FOR CANCER PAIN

被引:67
作者
BRUERA, E
WATANABE, S
FAINSINGER, RL
SPACHYNSKI, K
SUAREZALMAZOR, M
INTURRISI, C
机构
[1] UNIV ALBERTA, HLTH CARE QUAL & OUTCOME RES CTR, EDMONTON, AB, CANADA
[2] CORNELL UNIV, COLL MED, DEPT PHARMACOL, NEW YORK, NY 10021 USA
关键词
HYDROMORPHONE; METHADONE; CANCER PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/0304-3959(94)00257-F
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In a prospective, open study, 37 advanced cancer patients in poor pain control receiving high doses of subcutaneous hydromorphone (mean daily dose: 276 +/- 163 mg) were switched to methadone by use of custom-made capsules (21 patients) or suppositories (16 patients). The change in opioid took place over 6.5 +/- 3.6 days (oral) and 3.2 +/- 2.7 days (rectal). The methadone/hydromorphone dose ratios were 1.2 +/- 1.3 and 3 +/- 2 for the oral and rectal routes, respectively (P = 0.03) as compared to an expected ratio of 5-7, based on single dose available data. Pain intensity (VAS 0-100 mm) and the number of extra doses of analgesic per day were 51 +/- 22 and 3.2 +/- 2.7 with hydromorphone, versus 34 +/- 22 (P < 0.001) and 2.1 +/- 1.9 (P = 0.03) with methadone, respectively. The total cost of treatment was Canadian $148 +/- 202 with methadone as compared to Canadian $2135 +/- 472 with hydromorphone (P < 0.001). Toxicity was limited to mild sedation in all patients and proctitis in 2 patients on suppositories (one of whom required discontinuation of methadone). Plasma levels obtained in 6 patients on suppositories revealed large inter-individual variation in methadone level (ng/ml) to dose (mg/day) ratio (range: 0.8-8.5). Within individuals, the ratio remained constant over a range of doses. We conclude that a slow switch-over to methadone is a safe, effective and low cost alternative in selected cancer patients receiving high doses of opioids for poor prognostic pain syndromes.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 146
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[12]   INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN THE RESPONSE TO DIFFERENT OPIOIDS - REPORT OF 5 CASES [J].
GALER, BS ;
COYLE, N ;
PASTERNAK, GW ;
PORTENOY, RK .
PAIN, 1992, 49 (01) :87-91
[13]   PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF METHADONE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN [J].
INTURRISI, CE ;
COLBURN, WA ;
KAIKO, RF ;
HOUDE, RW ;
FOLEY, KM .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1987, 41 (04) :392-401
[14]  
INTURRISI CE, 1993, OXFORD TXB PALLIATIV, P166
[15]   PHARMACOKINETIC BASIS FOR OPTIMAL METHADONE TREATMENT OF PAIN IN CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
PAALZOW, L ;
NILSSON, L ;
STENBERG, P .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 26 :55-58
[16]  
Rogers A D, 1988, J Pain Symptom Manage, V3, P45, DOI 10.1016/0885-3924(88)90137-6
[17]   PATIENT-CONTROLLED DOSE REGIMEN OF METHADONE FOR CHRONIC CANCER PAIN [J].
SAWE, J ;
HANSEN, J ;
GINMAN, C ;
HARTVIG, P ;
JAKOBSSON, PA ;
NILSSON, MI ;
RANE, A ;
ANGGARD, E .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 282 (6266) :771-773
[18]   METHADONE AND ELDERLY [J].
SYMONDS, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1977, 1 (6059) :512-512
[19]   COMPARISON OF DIAMORPHINE WITH COCAINE AND METHADONE [J].
TWYCROSS, RG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1977, 4 (06) :691-693
[20]  
MONOGRAPH MANAGEMENT