Evaluation of contact sensitivity to formaldehyde and tetramethylthiuram monosulfide using a modified lymphocyte transformation test

被引:4
作者
Li, Q
Wang, ZY
Inagaki, H
Li, YJ
Minami, M
机构
[1] Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113
关键词
contact hypersensitivity; lymphocyte transformation; formaldehyde; tetramethylthiuram monosulfide; epidermal cells;
D O I
10.1016/0300-483X(95)03117-X
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
To examine the validity of a modified lymphocyte transformation test for evaluating contact hypersensitivity from weak sensitizers, guinea pigs were sensitized with formaldehyde (F) or tetramethylthiuram monosulfide (TMTM) using the maximization test procedure. Lymph node cells from the animals were then cultured with F or TMTM, in the presence or absence of epidermal cells (EC). Transformed lymphocyte counts were evaluated by uptake of H-3-thymidine. Nonsensitized guinea pigs were used as controls. The lymphocytes from sensitized guinea pigs showed stronger blastogenesis when cultured with F or TMTM in the presence of EC than when the sensitizers were not added to the culture and the response depended on the concentration of F or TMTM. Cultures in the absence of EC also showed significant enhancement of blastogenesis by F or TMTM, but the responses were significantly weaker than those in the presence of EC. Lymphocytes from the control animals did not show significantly enhanced blastogenesis in response to F or TMTM, even when EC was added to the cultures. The results suggested that contact sensitivity for weak sensitizers can be evaluated by this modified lymphocyte transformation test, especially when lymph node cells were co-cultured with EC.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 23
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   CONTACT ALLERGY TO THE PRESERVATIVE KATHON CG [J].
BJORKNER, B ;
BRUZE, M ;
DAHLQUIST, I ;
FREGERT, S ;
GRUVBERGER, B ;
PERSSON, K .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1986, 14 (02) :85-90
[2]   HUMAN EPIDERMAL LANGERHANS CELLS ARE MORE POTENT THAN BLOOD MONOCYTES IN INDUCING SOME ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC T-CELL RESPONSES [J].
BRAATHEN, LR ;
THORSBY, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1983, 108 (02) :139-146
[3]  
EVERNESS KM, 1990, BRIT J DERMATOL, V4122, P293
[4]  
FISHER AA, 1986, CONTACT DERMATITIS, P9
[5]  
GOCINSKI BL, 1990, J IMMUNOL, V144, P4121
[6]  
KIMBER I, 1991, CONTACT DERMATITIS, V24, P164
[7]   SEPARATION OF THE EPIDERMAL SHEET BY DISPASE [J].
KITANO, Y ;
OKADA, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1983, 108 (05) :555-560
[8]  
LI Q, 1991, Japanese Journal of Industrial Health, V33, P509
[9]   STUDY OF DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP IN CONTACT SENSITIVITY USING AN INVITRO ASSAY [J].
LI, Q ;
AOYAMA, K .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1992, 27 (01) :16-21
[10]   IDENTIFICATION OF CONTACT ALLERGENS BY ANIMAL ASSAY . GUINEA PIG MAXIMIZATION TEST [J].
MAGNUSSON, B ;
KLIGMAN, AM .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1969, 52 (03) :268-+