Towards an Integrated Urban Space Framework for Emerging Urban Conditions in a High-density Context

被引:16
作者
Cho, Im Sik [1 ]
Trivic, Zdravko [2 ]
Nasution, Ivan [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Architecture, Sch Design & Environm, 4 Architecture Dr, Singapore 117566, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, CSAC, Sch Design & Environm, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
D O I
10.1080/13574809.2015.1009009
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
In the dense and hybrid urban conditions emerging globally, urban space is seen not only as a precious and contested commodity, but also as one of the key vehicles for achieving socially, environmentally and economically sustainable urban living. Therefore, the conventional ways of designing, utilizing and managing public spaces need to be revisited and re-conceptualized, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Drawing from contemporary theories and concepts addressing the quality of public spaces, this paper outlines the discourse analysis used to develop an integrated Urban Space Framework to systematically classify, assess, analyze and guide the design of urban spaces in highdensity contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 168
页数:22
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1889, CITY PLANNING ACCORD
[2]  
Knox, 2007, SOC VAL PUBL SPAC
[3]  
Salingaros N.A., 1999, J URBAN DES, V4, P29, DOI [10.1080/13574809908724437, DOI 10.1080/13574809908724437]
[4]   Pleasure, politics, and the "public interest" - Melbourne's riverscape revitalization [J].
Sandercock, L ;
Dovey, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2002, 68 (02) :151-164
[5]   INTRODUCTION Space, Place and the City: Emerging Research on Public Space Design and Planning [J].
Schmidt, Stephan ;
Nemeth, Jeremy .
JOURNAL OF URBAN DESIGN, 2010, 15 (04) :453-457
[6]  
Sennett R., 1977, FALL PUBLIC MAN
[7]  
Shaftoe H., 2008, EARTHSCAN ASS INT I
[8]  
Shelton B, 2011, PLAN HIST ENVIRON SE, P1
[9]  
Shelton B., 2012, LEARNING JAPANESE CI
[10]   Measuring urban form - Is Portland winning the war on sprawl? [J].
Song, Y ;
Knaap, GJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2004, 70 (02) :210-225