CHRONIC DESENSITIZATION AND DOWN-REGULATION OF THE GASTRIN-RELEASING PEPTIDE RECEPTOR ARE MEDIATED BY A PROTEIN-KINASE C-DEPENDENT MECHANISM

The cellular basis of down-regulation and desensitization in phospholipase C-linked receptors is unclear. Recent studies with some receptors suggest that elements in the carboxyl terminus of the receptor are important in mediating these processes. Three mutant gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRP-R) were studied: one whose last 37 carboxyl-terminal amino acids were eliminated (construct MGT346); one that replaced all of the carboxyl-terminal Ser and Thr eliminated in MGT346 with Ala, Asn, or Gly (construct JF1); and one that selectively replaced the Ser and Thr of the protein kinase C consensus sequence (PKC-CS) located within the same region with alanine (construct TS360AA). Desensitization was assessed by measuring the ability to activate phospholipase C and increase cellular [H-3]inositol phosphates, or increase [Ca2+](i), after pre-exposure to 3 nM bombesin for 24 h. Wild-type GRP-R was maximally desensitized and down-regulated after a 24-h exposure to 3 nM bombesin, and removal of the PKC-CS alone markedly attenuated each process. Elimination of additional serines and threonines by truncation (MGT346) or replacement (JF1) did not decrease down-regulation or desensitization further. To coli firm the necessity of sec ond messenger activation in mediating down-regulation, we further investigated two additional mutant GRP-R that bound agonist with high affinity but fail to activate phospholipase C (constructs R139G and A263E). Neither construct underwent significant down-regulation. Removal of all GRP-R carboxyl-terminal Ser or Thr, either by MGT346 or JF1, reduced internalization by > 80%, whereas elimination of the PKC-CS in TS360AA only attenuated internalization by 21 +/- 2%. These data suggest that activation of the distal carboxyl-terminal PKC-CS is essential for chronic desensitization and down-regulation of the GRP-R, and provide no evidence for involvement of second messenger-independent processes. In contrast, internalization is equally regulated by both second messenger-dependent and independent processes.