PROGRAMMING SHIFTS OF SPATIAL ATTENTION

被引:19
作者
UMILTA, C
MUCIGNAT, C
RIGGIO, L
BARBIERI, C
RIZZOLATTI, G
机构
[1] UNIV PARMA,IST FISIOL UMANA,VIA GRAMSCI 14,I-43100 PARMA,ITALY
[2] UNIV PADUA,DEPT GEN PSYCHOL,I-35100 PADUA,ITALY
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY | 1994年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09541449408520133
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two experiments are described, which were aimed at studying attention allocation at different times following directional cognitive cue presentation. In Experiment 1, the stimulus display consisted of a fixation cross and four boxes for stimulus presentation. The boxes were arranged horizontally above fixation. In Experiment 2, there were two rows of boxes, one above and one below fixation. In both experiments, the subjects were asked to shift attention from fixation to the cued box and to respond manually as fast as possible to the occurrence of a visual imperative stimulus, regardless of its location. The imperative stimulus was presented in the cued box or in one of the noncued positions. The time interval between cue and imperative stimulus onset (SOA) varied from 100 to 700 msec. The results showed a striking difference in the pattern of attention allocation following short (100-160 msec) and long (300-700 msec) SOAs. Following short SOAs, attention spanned a relatively large portion of space, with the locations closer to fixation producing the fastest RTs. With long SOAs (300, 500, or 700 msec), attention was focused on the cued box. We propose that direction and amplitude of an attention movement are initially computed in such a way as to form a broad, attentional sector within which the cued location is included. All locations that lie within this sector initially get attention benefits. Then, attention is tuned more narrowly. After a delay of about 300 msec, the computation of attention direction and amplitude is completed and attention is restricted to the cued location.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 41
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   SPATIAL MAPS OF DIRECTED VISUAL-ATTENTION [J].
HUGHES, HC ;
ZIMBA, LD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1985, 11 (04) :409-430
[12]  
HUMPHREYS GW, 1989, VISUAL COGNITION
[13]   ON THE COST AND BENEFIT OF COST AND BENEFIT [J].
JONIDES, J ;
MACK, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 96 (01) :29-44
[14]  
Jonides J., 1981, ATTENTION PERFORM, VIX, P187, DOI DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.835
[15]   CHRONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF APPARENT SPOTLIGHT FAILURE IN ENDOGENOUS VISUAL ORIENTING [J].
KLEIN, R ;
HANSEN, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (04) :790-801
[16]   THE CONTROL AND SPEED OF SHIFTS OF ATTENTION [J].
KROSE, BJA ;
JULESZ, B .
VISION RESEARCH, 1989, 29 (11) :1607-1619
[17]   FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR A TIME-INDEPENDENT SHIFT OF THE FOCUS OF ATTENTION [J].
KWAK, HW ;
DAGENBACH, D ;
EGETH, H .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1991, 49 (05) :473-480
[18]   THEORY OF ATTENTIONAL OPERATIONS IN SHAPE IDENTIFICATION [J].
LABERGE, D ;
BROWN, V .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 96 (01) :101-124
[19]   INDIVIDUAL AND SIMULTANEOUS TRACKING OF A STEP INPUT BY HORIZONTAL SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENT AND MANUAL CONTROL-SYSTEMS [J].
MEGAW, ED ;
ARMSTRONG, W .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 100 (01) :18-28
[20]   THE EFFECT OF VISUAL-ATTENTION ON PERIPHERAL DISCRIMINATION THRESHOLDS IN SINGLE AND MULTIPLE ELEMENT DISPLAYS [J].
MULLER, HJ ;
FINDLAY, JM .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1988, 69 (02) :129-155