Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations

被引:1757
作者
Rucker, Derek D. [1 ]
Preacher, Kristopher J. [2 ]
Tormala, Zakary L. [3 ,5 ]
Petty, Richard E. [4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Quantitat Psychol Training Program, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Mkt, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[6] APA, Amer Assoc Adv Sci, Amer Acad Arts & Sci, Cambridge, MA USA
[7] APS, Washington, DC USA
来源
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS | 2011年 / 5卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A key aim of social psychology is to understand the psychological processes through which independent variables affect dependent variables in the social domain. This objective has given rise to statistical methods for mediation analysis. In mediation analysis, the significance of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables has been integral in theory testing, being used as a basis to determine (1) whether to proceed with analyses of mediation and (2) whether one or several proposed mediator(s) fully or partially accounts for an effect. Synthesizing past research and offering new arguments, we suggest that the collective evidence raises considerable concern that the focus on the significance between the independent and dependent variables, both before and after mediation tests, is unjustified and can impair theory development and testing. To expand theory involving social psychological processes, we argue that attention in mediation analysis should be shifted towards assessing the magnitude and significance of indirect effects.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 371
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[2]   Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium [J].
Hayes, Andrew F. .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2009, 76 (04) :408-420
[3]  
Hoyle R. H., 1999, STAT STRATEGIES SMAL
[4]   MEDIATORS, MODERATORS, AND TESTS FOR MEDIATION [J].
JAMES, LR ;
BRETT, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 69 (02) :307-321
[5]   PROCESS ANALYSIS - ESTIMATING MEDIATION IN TREATMENT EVALUATIONS [J].
JUDD, CM ;
KENNY, DA .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1981, 5 (05) :602-619
[6]   The negative impact of perceiving discrimination on collective well-being: the mediating role of perceived ingroup status [J].
Leonardelli, GJ ;
Tormala, ZL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 33 (04) :507-514
[7]  
Little T.D., 2007, MODELING CONTEXTUAL, V1, P207, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203936825
[8]   Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect [J].
MacKinnon D.P. ;
Krull J.L. ;
Lockwood C.M. .
Prevention Science, 2000, 1 (4) :173-181
[9]   Mediation analysis [J].
MacKinnon, David P. ;
Fairchild, Amanda J. ;
Fritz, Matthew S. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 58 :593-614
[10]   A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects [J].
MacKinnon, DP ;
Lockwood, CM ;
Hoffman, JM ;
West, SG ;
Sheets, V .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (01) :83-104