This study was designed to compare the cardiac electrophysiological and mechanical effects of iodixanol to those of iotrolan, iopromide, ioxaglate and diatrizoate. Two consecutive injections of contrast media (CM) (0.3 g I/kg and 0.9 g I/kg b.w.) were given to spontaneously beating, LANGENDORFF-perfused rat hearts. CM were given as a single, short-lasting bolus injection (i.e., over 2 and 5 s). Changes in aortic pressure, left ventricular pressures and ECG were continuously recorded during constant volume perfusion. The nonionic CM had less pronounced effects on aortic pressure than had the ionic media. The peak rate of isovolumetric contraction (LV dP/dt(max)) was slightly decreased by iodixanol and iotrolan, slightly more decreased by iopromide and markedly decreased by ioxaglate and diatrizoate. Similarly, the peak rate of pressure decline (LV dP/dt(min)) was only slightly decreased by iodixanol and iotrolan. Also, the 2 nonionic dimers had the smallest effects on left ventricular enddiastolic pressure (LVEDP) and heart rate. Ioxaglate lengthened the PQ-interval, but less so than diatrizoate. The QT-interval was only slightly lengthened by iodixanol and iotrolan, as compared to the lenghtening caused by iopromide, ioxaglate and diatrizoate. Single ventricular extrasystoles were seen in all groups. Extrasystoles up to 3 coupled beats were registered after ioxaglate and diatrizoate. No episodes of ventricular fibrillation occurred with any CM. In conclusion, the nonionic dimers, and in particular iodixanol, induce only minor changes in cardiac function, whereas the ionic dimer ioxaglate and the ionic monomer diatrizoate induce pronounced effects.