DIFFUSE UTERINE ADENOMYOSIS - MORPHOLOGIC CRITERIA AND DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF ENDOVAGINAL SONOGRAPHY

被引:105
作者
REINHOLD, C
ATRI, M
MEHIO, A
ZAKARIAN, R
ALDIS, AE
BRET, PM
机构
[1] MONTREAL GEN HOSP,DEPT PATHOL,MONTREAL,PQ H3G 1A4,CANADA
[2] MCGILL UNIV,SCH MED,MONTREAL,PQ H3G 1A4,CANADA
关键词
ENDOMETRIOSIS; UTERUS; ABNORMALITIES; US;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480727
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of endovaginal ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis and to evaluate the frequency of observed sonographic criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endovaginal US was performed in 100 consecutive women undergoing hysterectomy for a variety of benign and malignant conditions. Adenomyosis was diagnosed when a poorly defined area of abnormal echotexture (decreased or increased echogenicity, heterogeneous echotexture, myometrial cysts) was present in the myometrium. All endovaginal US findings were correlated with those from histologic examination. RESULTS: Endovaginal US depicted 25 of 29 pathologically proved cases of adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was correctly ruled out in 61 of 71 patients. Endovaginal US had a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 86%, and a positive and negative predictive value of 71% and 94%, respectively. Of the 25 patients with true-positive findings at US, the myometrium demonstrated heterogeneous and hypoechoic areas with or without the presence of cysts in 21 (84%) patients, hypoechoic areas with cysts in three (12%) patients, and heterogeneous areas within the myometrium in one (4%) patient. CONCLUSION: Adenomyosis of the uterus can be accurately diagnosed with endovaginal US with use of specific sonographic criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 614
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
Coleman B.G., Arger P.H., Grumbach K., Et al., Transvaginal and transabdominal sonography: Prospective comparison, Radiology, 168, pp. 639-643, (1988)
[22]  
Timor-Tritsch I.E., Bar-Yam Y., Elgali S., Rottem S., The technique of transvaginal sonography with the use of a 6.5-MHz probe, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 158, pp. 1019-1024, (1988)
[23]  
Fleischer A.C., Pennell R.G., McKee M.S., Ectopic pregnancy: Features at transvaginal sonography, Radiology, 174, pp. 375-378, (1990)
[24]  
Tessler F.N., Perrella R.R., Fleischer A.C., Grant E.G., Endovaginal sonographic diagnosis of dilated fallopian tubes, AJR, 153, pp. 523-525, (1989)
[25]  
Lyons E.A., Gratton D., Harrington C., Transvaginal sonography of normal pelvic anatomy, Radiol Clin North Am, 30, pp. 663-676, (1992)
[26]  
Fedele L., Bianchi S., Dorta M., Arcaini L., Zanotti F., Carinelli S., Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis, Fertil Steril, 58, pp. 94-97, (1992)
[27]  
Landis J.R., Koch G.G., A review of statistical methods in the analysis of data arising from observer reliability studies (part 1), Stat Neer, 29, pp. 101-123, (1975)
[28]  
Fedele L., Bianchi S., Dorta M., Zanotti F., Brioschi D., Carinelli S., Transvaginal ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma versus leiomyoma, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 167, pp. 603-606, (1992)
[29]  
Ascher S.M., Arnold L.L., Patt R.H., Et al., Adenomyosis: Prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography, Radiology, 190, pp. 803-806, (1994)
[30]  
Hricak H., Finck S., Honda G., Goranson H., MR imaging in the evaluation of benign uterine masses: Value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced T1-weighted images, AJR, 158, pp. 1043-1050, (1992)