Relationships of organizational culture toward knowledge activities

被引:39
作者
Lai, Ming-Fong [1 ]
Lee, Gwo-Guang [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Informat Management, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Organizational culture; Knowledge management;
D O I
10.1108/14637150710740518
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This study seeks to explore factors affecting the implementation of knowledge activities, which are the organizational culture which many knowledge management programs adopt. The main problem under investigation is to assess the importance of organizational culture within an enterprise and to ascertain how it can ensure that knowledge activities would continue to be fitting and proper in an enterprise. Design/methodology/approach - An empirical survey was conducted in 154 Taiwanese companies to investigate understanding of the organizational cultures, determine enablers and barriers to implement knowledge activities. Findings - It is suggested that enterprises should adopt an entrepreneurial culture when establishing knowledge activities. Research limitations/implications - Since it was a mass mailing of a somewhat lengthy, blind survey to busy managers, the response rate was believed to be low. Even so, because of the low response rate, the generalized nature of these finds is somewhat in question, and it is important that the study be replicated in Taiwan. Practical implications - The awareness of the external versus internal focus of the organizations will make the organization more or less aware of adoptions in organizational culture efforts and either more or less conducive to implementing knowledge activities. Originality/value - This study points out the need for the consideration of culture when knowledge activities are implemented that may be incompatible with the existing culture. Such organizations can benefit from understanding culture's role in knowledge activities implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 322
页数:17
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Ackerman M.S., 1996, INFORM TECHNOLOGY PE, V9, P10, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1108/09593849610111553, DOI 10.1108/09593849610111553]
[2]  
Andreou A. N., 2002, J INTELLECT CAP, V3, P248
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, LISREL 6 ANAL LINEAR
[4]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1988, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V16, P74, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1007/BF02723327]
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF PESSIMISM - HOPELESSNESS SCALE [J].
BECK, AT ;
WEISSMAN, A ;
LESTER, D ;
TREXLER, L .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 42 (06) :861-865
[6]  
BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[7]   Dimensions of the knowledge management process [J].
Berztiss, AT .
12TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, :437-441
[8]   Systems integration and knowledge management [J].
Bourdreau, A ;
Couillard, G .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1999, 16 (04) :24-32
[9]   TESTING FOR THE EQUIVALENCE OF FACTOR COVARIANCE AND MEAN STRUCTURES - THE ISSUE OF PARTIAL MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE [J].
BYRNE, BM ;
SHAVELSON, RJ ;
MUTHEN, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (03) :456-466
[10]  
Cameron K. S., 1985, RATIONAL MANAGEMENT, P142