CUTTING BOARDS OF PLASTIC AND WOOD CONTAMINATED EXPERIMENTALLY WITH BACTERIA

被引:93
作者
AK, NO
CLIVER, DO
KASPAR, CW
机构
[1] UNIV WISCONSIN, FOOD RES INST, DEPT FOOD MICROBIOL & TOXICOL, MADISON, WI 53706 USA
[2] UNIV WISCONSIN, DEPT FOOD SCI, MADISON, WI 53706 USA
[3] UNIV WISCONSIN, DEPT BACTERIOL, MADISON, WI 53706 USA
[4] UNIV WISCONSIN, DEPT ANIM HLTH & BIOMED SCI, MADISON, WI 53706 USA
[5] UNIV WISCONSIN, WHO, COLLABORATING CTR FOOD VIROL, MADISON, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-57.1.16
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
microbiology of plastic and wooden cutting boards was studied, regarding cross-contamination of foods in home kitchens. New and used plastic (four polymers plus hard rubber) and wood (nine hardwoods) cutting boards were cut into 5-cm squares (''blocks''). Escherichia coli (two nonpathogenic strains plus type O157:H7), Listeria innocua, L. monocytogenes, or Salmonella typhimurium was applied to the 25-cm(2) block surface in nutrient broth or chicken juice and recovered by soaking the surface in nutrient broth or pressing the block onto nutrient agar, within 3-10 min or up to ca. 12 h later. Bacteria inoculated onto plastic blocks were readily recovered for minutes to hours and would multiply if held overnight. Recoveries from wooden blocks were generally less than those from plastic blocks, regardless of new or used status; differences increased with holding time. Clean wood blocks usually absorbed the inoculum completely within 3-10 min. If these fluids contained 10(3)-10(4) CFLT of bacteria likely to come from raw meat or poultry, the bacteria generally could not be recovered after entering the wood. If greater than or equal to 10(6) CFU were applied, bacteria might be recovered from wood after 12 h at room temperature and high humidity, but numbers were reduced by at least 98%, and often more than 99.9%. Mineral oil treatment of the wood surface had little effect on the microbiological findings. These results do not support the often-heard assertion that plastic cutting boards are more sanitary than wood.The microbiology of plastic and wooden cutting boards was studied, regarding cross-contamination of foods in home kitchens. New and used plastic (four polymers plus hard rubber) and wood (nine hardwoods) cutting boards were cut into 5-cm squares (''blocks''). Escherichia coli (two nonpathogenic strains plus type O157:H7), Listeria innocua, L. monocytogenes, or Salmonella typhimurium was applied to the 25-cm(2) block surface in nutrient broth or chicken juice and recovered by soaking the surface in nutrient broth or pressing the block onto nutrient agar, within 3-10 min or up to ca. 12 h later. Bacteria inoculated onto plastic blocks were readily recovered for minutes to hours and would multiply if held overnight. Recoveries from wooden blocks were generally less than those from plastic blocks, regardless of new or used status; differences increased with holding time. Clean wood blocks usually absorbed the inoculum completely within 3-10 min. If these fluids contained 10(3)-10(4) CFU of bacteria likely to come from raw meat or poultry, the bacteria generally could not be recovered after entering the wood. If greater than or equal to 10(6) CFU were applied, bacteria might be recovered from wood after 12 h at room temperature and high humidity, but numbers were reduced by at least 98%, and often more than 99.9%. Mineral oil treatment of the wood surface had little effect on the microbiological findings. These results do not support the often-heard assertion that plastic cutting boards are more sanitary than wood.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   DECONTAMINATION OF PLASTIC AND WOODEN CUTTING BOARDS FOR KITCHEN USE [J].
AK, NO ;
CLIVER, DO ;
KASPAR, CW .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1994, 57 (01) :23-+
[2]  
DAMON RA, 1987, EXPT DESIGN NOVA REG
[3]   CROSS-CONTAMINATION WITH CAMPYLOBACTER-JEJUNI AND SALMONELLA-SPP FROM RAW CHICKEN PRODUCTS DURING FOOD PREPARATION [J].
DEBOER, E ;
HAHNE, M .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1990, 53 (12) :1067-1068
[4]  
Forsythe R. H., 1992, Dairy, Food and Environmental Sanitation, V12, P149
[5]  
Gilbert R. J., 1971, Journal of Food Technology, V6, P163
[6]   COMPARISON OF MATERIALS USED FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT IN RETAIL FOOD PREMISES, AND OF 2 METHODS FOR ENUMERATION OF BACTERIA ON CLEANED EQUIPMENT AND WORK SURFACES [J].
GILBERT, RJ .
JOURNAL OF HYGIENE-CAMBRIDGE, 1970, 68 (02) :221-+
[7]   RECOVERY OF SALMONELLAE FROM CHILLED BROILER CARCASSES AS AFFECTED BY RINSE MEDIA AND ENUMERATION METHOD [J].
JETTON, JP ;
BILGILI, SF ;
CONNER, DE ;
KOTROLA, JS ;
REIBER, MA .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1992, 55 (05) :329-332
[8]  
KAMPELMACHER EH, 1971, ALIMENTA, P70
[9]  
LAPPING L, 1991, HOLIDAYS, P8
[10]  
MOSSEL DAA, 1966, ZENTBL BAKTERIOLOG P, V201, P91