Clinically Addressing Biofilm in Chronic Wounds

被引:182
作者
Attinger, Christopher [1 ]
Wolcott, Randy [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Div Wound Healing, 3800 Reservoir Rd, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Southwest Reg Wound Care Ctr, Lubbock, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/wound.2011.0333
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: A chronic wound is a wound that is arrested in the inflammatory phase of wound healing and cannot progress further. Over 90% of chronic wounds contain bacteria and fungi living within a biofilm construct. The Problem: Each aggregation of microbes creates a distinct biofilm with differing characteristics so that a clinical approach has to be tailored to the specifics of a given biofilm. Defining the characteristics of that biofilm and then designing a therapeutic option particular to that biofilm is currently being defined. Basic/Clinical Science Advances: Biofilm becomes resistant to therapeutic maneuvers at 48-96 h after formation. By repeatedly attacking it on a regular schedule, one forces biofilm to reattach and reform during which time it is susceptible to antibiotics and host defenses. Identifying the multiple bacteria and fungi that make up a specific biofilm using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) allows directed therapeutic maneuvers such as application of specific topical antibiotics and biocides to increase the effectiveness of the debridement. Clinical Care Relevance: Most chronic wounds contain biofilm that perpetuate the inflammatory phase of wound healing. Combining debridement with using PCR to identify the bacteria and fungi within the biofilm allows for more targeted therapeutic maneuvers to eliminate a given biofilm. Conclusion: Therapeutic options in addition to debridement are currently being evaluated to address biofilm. Using PCR to direct adjunctive therapeutic maneuvers may increase the effectiveness of addressing biofilm in a chronic wound.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 132
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Serial surgical debridement: A retrospective study on clinical outcomes in chronic lower extremity wounds [J].
Cardinal, Matthew ;
Eisenbud, David E. ;
Armstrong, David G. ;
Zelen, Charles ;
Driver, Vickie ;
Attinger, Christopher ;
Phillips, Tania ;
Harding, Keith .
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2009, 17 (03) :306-311
[2]   Patterns of virulence gene expression differ between biofilm and tissue communities of Streptococcus pyogenes [J].
Cho, KH ;
Caparon, MG .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 57 (06) :1545-1556
[3]   Oxidative stress and "Senescent" fibroblasts in non-healing wounds as potential therapeutic targets [J].
Clark, Richard A. F. .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2008, 128 (10) :2361-2364
[4]   Debridement of the noninfected wound [J].
Cornell, Rhonda S. ;
Meyr, Andrew J. ;
Steinberg, John S. ;
Attinger, Christopher E. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 52 :31S-36S
[5]   Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo [J].
Davis, Stephen C. ;
Ricotti, Carlos ;
Cazzaniga, Alex ;
Welsh, Esperanza ;
Eaglstein, William H. ;
Mertz, Patricia M. .
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2008, 16 (01) :23-29
[6]   Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using Pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing [J].
Dowd, Scot E. ;
Sun, Yan ;
Secor, Patrick R. ;
Rhoads, Daniel D. ;
Wolcott, Benjamin M. ;
James, Garth A. ;
Wolcott, Randall D. .
BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
[7]   Biofilms in chronic wounds [J].
James, Garth A. ;
Swogger, Ellen ;
Wolcott, Randall ;
Pulcini, Elinor deLancey ;
Secor, Patrick ;
Sestrich, Jennifer ;
Costerton, John W. ;
Stewart, Philip S. .
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2008, 16 (01) :37-44
[8]  
Kirshen Carly, 2006, Adv Skin Wound Care, V19, P506, DOI 10.1097/00129334-200611000-00011
[9]  
Morasso MI, 2005, BIOL CELL, V97, P173
[10]  
Piaggesi A, 1998, DIABETIC MED, V15, P412, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199805)15:5<412::AID-DIA584>3.0.CO