DIFFUSION OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY IN EUROPE

被引:10
作者
BANTA, HD [1 ]
VONDELING, H [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LIMBURG,DEPT HLTH ECON,6200 MD MAASTRICHT,NETHERLANDS
关键词
DIFFUSION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY; INCENTIVES; HEALTH POLICY; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1016/0168-8510(93)90011-D
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper considers the diffusion of the 10 cases presented in this issue. Most of the cases have diffused relatively slowly. This slow diffusion can be explained by a number of factors, including budgetary restraints, financial incentives, physician conservatism, and lack of appropriate training. A consistent thread in the cases is the argument that evidence of effectiveness is not convincing. The article considers whether further diffusion of each innovation can be justified from existing evidence. This information is important for policy purposes. Policies might be developed to encourage or to discourage any potentially important innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 133
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
[11]   ENDOSCOPIC HEMOSTASIS - AN EFFECTIVE THERAPY FOR BLEEDING PEPTIC-ULCERS [J].
SACKS, HS ;
CHALMERS, TC ;
BLUM, AL ;
BERRIER, J ;
PAGANO, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 264 (04) :494-499
[12]  
SCULPHER M, 1991, HERG9 RES REP