Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus process innovation Empirical evidence from SMEs located in Turkish science and technology parks

被引:147
作者
Ar, Ilker Murat [1 ]
Baki, Birdogan [1 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Business Adm, Business Adm, Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
Product innovation; Small to medium-sized enterprises; Science parks; Organizational processes;
D O I
10.1108/14601061111124885
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationships between seven antecedent factors (R&D strategy, top management support (TMS), customer focus (CF), organizational learning capability (OLC), creative capability (CC), organizational collaboration (OC), and supplier relationship (SR)), two innovation types (product and process), and firm performance (FP). Design/methodology/approach - The paper formulates 16 hypotheses from the literature review. These hypotheses are tested using structural equation modeling with data collected from 270 managers of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) located in Turkish science and technology parks (STPs). Findings - The findings indicate that both of product and process innovation have a strong and positive association with FP. While antecedents such as R&D strategy, TMS, CF, CC, and SR have significant impact on product innovation, other antecedents such as OLC and OC have a significant and positive impact on process innovation. Practical implications - The results of this study could be used by any managers of SMEs located in STPs to improve successful innovation projects. The results also provide companies operating in Turkish STPs with useful information on how their policies and actions might affect firm innovation. Originality/value - The paper provides a clarification of the reasons that may be behind a positive, a negative, or a non-significant effect of the many antecedents on the product and process in SMEs located in Turkish STPs.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / +
页数:38
相关论文
共 131 条
[71]  
Kleindl B., 1996, C P, P211
[72]   Organizational determinants of innovation capacity in software companies [J].
Koc, Tufan .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 53 (03) :373-385
[73]   Development and innovation potential in the Slovene manufacturing industry: analysis of an industrial innovation survey [J].
Koschatzky, K ;
Bross, U ;
Stanovnik, P .
TECHNOVATION, 2001, 21 (05) :311-324
[74]   Product development practices and performance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis [J].
Koufteros, Xenophon ;
Marcoulides, George A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2006, 103 (01) :286-307
[75]   A comparisson of innovation capacity at science parks across the Taiwan strait: the case of Zhangjiang High-Tech Park and Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park [J].
Lai, HC ;
Shyu, JZ .
TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (07) :805-813
[76]   Adoption of behaviour: predicting success for major innovations [J].
Langley, David J. ;
Pals, Nico ;
Ortt, J. Roland .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 8 (01) :56-+
[77]  
Lau C.M., 2004, INT BUS REV, V13, P685, DOI [10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.08.001, DOI 10.1016/J.IBUSREV.2004.08.001]
[78]   Building dynamic capabilities for innovation: an exploratory study of key management practices [J].
Lee, Hyunsuk ;
Kelley, Donna .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2008, 38 (02) :155-168
[79]   Creativity-innovation cycle for organisational exploration and exploitation: Lessons from Neowiz - a Korean Internet company [J].
Lee, Kyungmook ;
Rho, Sangkyu ;
Kim, Seongsu ;
Jun, Gyung Ju .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2007, 40 (4-5) :505-523
[80]   The cradle of Taiwan high technology industry development - Hsinchu Science Park (HSP) [J].
Lee, WH ;
Yang, WT .
TECHNOVATION, 2000, 20 (01) :55-59