SELENITE AND SELENATE QUANTIFICATION BY HYDRIDE GENERATION ATOMIC-ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY, ION CHROMATOGRAPHY, AND COLORIMETRY

被引:22
作者
BLAYLOCK, MJ [1 ]
JAMES, BR [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MARYLAND,DEPT AGRON,COLL PK,MD 20742
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200040031x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The need for a routine, inexpensive method with nanomolar detection limits for soluble SeO32- and SeO42- is increasing as Se research on soil-plant-water systems intensifies and speciation of Se valence states is required. This study was undertaken to compare hydride generation-atomic absorption spectrometry (HGAAS), colorimetry using 2,3-diaminonaphthalene (DAN), and ion chromatography (IC) as suitable methods for analysis of SeO32- and SeO42- in soil extracts and water samples. Selenium standards in solutions of either 1.0 mM KH2PO4, CaSO4, and KNO3, or in distilled water were analyzed to determine detection limits (DL), limits of quantitation (LOQ), and practicality for routine use of the above methods. A 0.1 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 soil extract spiked with 2.0 or 20 muM SeO32- and SeO42- was also used to compare the precision of the three methods. The HGAAS method was the most sensitive (0.212 absorbance units/muM) and had the lowest DL for SeO32- (0.03 mumol Se/L) of the three methods employed. Detection limits for the DAN and IC methods were significantly higher (18 and 0.24 mumol Se/L, respectively). Poor reproducibility between methods was obtained for SeO42- content of the soil extract containing 20 muM SeO42-, with concentrations ranging from 9.1 +/- 1.2 mumol/L determined by HGAAS to 24.6 +/- 0.05 mumol/L by IC. The variability and poor recovery of SeO42- was due to variabilty in efficiency of the HCI reduction required to reduce SeO42- to SeO32- before analysis in the HGAAS and DAN procedures. Selenium determinations in samples where low detection limits (<0.1 muM) are required are most effectively accomplished with HGAAS. Colorimetry requires greater effort and time from the analyst to obtain the low detection limits of HGAAS, but is useful in that only a visible light spectrometer is required. Ion chromatography is capable of automated determinations of SeO32- and SeO42- directly in combination with other ions of interest and may be appropriate for soil solution Se analysis where Se speciation is required.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 857
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]  
IHNAT M, 1980, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V63, P814
[12]   INTERLABORATORY TRIAL ON THE DETERMINATION OF TOTAL SELENIUM IN LYOPHILIZED HUMAN-BLOOD SERUM [J].
IHNAT, M ;
WOLYNETZ, MS ;
THOMASSEN, Y ;
VERLINDEN, M .
PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 1986, 58 (07) :1063-1076
[13]   DETERMINATION OF SELENATE BY SINGLE-COLUMN ION CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
KARLSON, U ;
FRANKENBERGER, WT .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1986, 368 (01) :153-161
[14]   SINGLE-COLUMN ION CHROMATOGRAPHY OF SELENITE IN SOIL EXTRACTS [J].
KARLSON, U ;
FRANKENBERGER, WT .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1986, 58 (13) :2704-2708
[15]  
LAKIN HW, 1973, GEOL SURV PROF PAP U, V820, P573
[16]  
LEWIS SA, 1989, OCCURRENCE DISTRIBUT, P3
[17]   TRANSFORMATIONS OF SELENIUM AS AFFECTED BY SEDIMENT OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL AND PH [J].
MASSCHELEYN, PH ;
DELAUNE, RD ;
PATRICK, WH .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 24 (01) :91-96
[18]   BIOGEOCHEMICAL BEHAVIOR OF SELENIUM IN ANOXIC SOILS AND SEDIMENTS - AN EQUILIBRIUM THERMODYNAMICS APPROACH [J].
MASSCHELEYN, PH ;
DELAUNE, RD ;
PATRICK, WH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING & TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE CONTROL, 1991, 26 (04) :555-573
[19]   SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF ARSENITE, ARSENATE, SELENITE, AND SELENATE BY SUPPRESSED ION CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
MCGEEHAN, SL ;
NAYLOR, DV .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1992, 21 (01) :68-73
[20]   THE RATE OF REDUCTION OF SELENIUM(VI) TO SELENIUM(IV) IN HYDROCHLORIC-ACID [J].
PETTERSSON, J ;
OLIN, A .
TALANTA, 1991, 38 (04) :413-417