PHARMACOKINETIC-PHARMACODYNAMIC RELATIONSHIPS OF METHADONE INFUSIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER PAIN

被引:88
作者
INTURRISI, CE
PORTENOY, RK
MAX, MB
COLBURN, WA
FOLEY, KM
机构
[1] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR, DEPT NEUROL, PAIN RES PROGRAM, NEW YORK, NY 10021 USA
[2] CORNELL UNIV, MED CTR, COLL MED, DEPT NEUROL, NEW YORK, NY 10021 USA
[3] WARNER LAMBERT PARKE DAVIS, DEPT PHARMACOKINET DRUG METAB, ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/clpt.1990.77
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
To determine the relationship between changes in plasma methadone concentration and pharmacodynamic effects, plasma methadone profiles and pharmacodynamics (analgesia and sedation) were measured during and after the continuous infusion of methadone for 180 to 270 minutes in 15 patients with pain caused by cancer. An increase in plasma methadone concentration resulted in a rapid increase in pain relief or sedation. The estimates of values of 50% of maximum effect (Css50) for pain relief and sedation obtained with a pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic model varied tenfold to twentyfold among patients; the mean Css50 value for pain relief (0.359 ± 0.158 [SD] μg/ml) was virtually the same as the mean Css50 value for sedation (0.336 ± 0.205 [SD] μg/ml). Similarly, the mean γ (slope function) for pain relief (4.4 ± 3.8 [SD]) and sedation (5.8 ± 5.4 [SD]) did not differ. Examination of hysteresis plots of data obtained during the infusion and for 4 to 5 hours after cessation of the infusion revealed a very rapid equilibration between plasma methadone values and the sites mediating pain relief. There was no indication of the development of tolerance to the pharmacodynamic effects of methadone during the study. This report describes a method for quantitating the pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic relationships of the desirable and undesirable effects of opioid analgesics. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (1990) 47, 565–577; doi: © 1990 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 577
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] MARTIN WR, 1976, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V197, P517
  • [22] CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS OF METHADONE
    NILSSON, MI
    MERESAAR, U
    ANGGARD, E
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 26 : 66 - 69
  • [23] ESTIMATION OF METHADONE CLEARANCE - APPLICATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CANCER PAIN
    PLUMMER, JL
    GOURLAY, GK
    CHERRY, DA
    COUSINS, MJ
    [J]. PAIN, 1988, 33 (03) : 313 - 322
  • [24] EEG QUANTITATION OF NARCOTIC EFFECT - THE COMPARATIVE PHARMACODYNAMICS OF FENTANYL AND ALFENTANIL
    SCOTT, JC
    PONGANIS, KV
    STANSKI, DR
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (03) : 234 - 241
  • [25] SCOTT JC, 1987, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V240, P159
  • [26] THE METHOD OF SEPARATE EXPONENTIALS - A SIMPLE AID TO DEVISING INTRAVENOUS DRUG-LOADING REGIMENS
    SHAND, DG
    DESJARDINS, RE
    BJORNSSON, TD
    HAMMILL, SC
    PRITCHETT, ELC
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1981, 29 (04) : 542 - 547
  • [27] SHEINER LB, 1979, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V25, P358
  • [28] THE MU-PROPERTIES, KAPPA-PROPERTIES AND DELTA-PROPERTIES OF VARIOUS OPIOID AGONISTS
    TAKEMORI, AE
    IKEDA, M
    PORTOGHESE, PS
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1986, 123 (03) : 357 - 361
  • [29] WALLENSTEIN SL, 1984, PAIN MEASUREMENT MAN, P389
  • [30] 1986, AM STAT, V40, P52