SOME THINGS YOU LEARN ARENT SO - COHENS PARADOX, ASCHS PARADIGM, AND THE INTERPRETATION OF INTERACTION

被引:147
作者
ROSNOW, RL [1 ]
ROSENTHAL, R [1 ]
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV,CAMBRIDGE,MA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00297.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When interpreting an interaction in the analysis of variance (ANOVA), many active researchers (and, in turn, students) often ignore the residuals defining the interaction, Although this problem has been noted previously, it appears that many users of ANOVA remain uncertain about the proper understanding of interaction effects. To clear up this problem, we review the way in which the ANOVA model enables us to take apart a table of group means or the individual measurements contributing to the means to reveal the underlying components. We also show how (using only published data) to compute a contrast on the question that may be of primary interest and illustrate strategies for interpreting tables of residuals. We conclude with an exercise to check on students' understanding of ANOVA and to encourage increased precision in the specification of research results.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 9
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
American Psychological Association, 1983, PUBL MAN AM PSYCH AS
[2]   THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR) [J].
COHEN, J .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1990, 45 (12) :1304-1312
[3]  
MOSTELLER F, 1983, BEGINNING STATISTICS
[4]  
ROSENTHAL R, 1987, JUDGMENT STUDIES DES
[5]  
Rosenthal R, 1985, CONTRAST ANAL FOCUSE
[6]  
ROSENTHAL R, 1991, ESSENTIALS BEHAVIORA
[7]   IF YOURE LOOKING AT THE CELL MEANS, YOURE NOT LOOKING AT ONLY THE INTERACTION (UNLESS ALL MAIN EFFECTS ARE ZERO) [J].
ROSNOW, RL ;
ROSENTHAL, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (03) :574-576
[8]   DEFINITION AND INTERPRETATION OF INTERACTION EFFECTS [J].
ROSNOW, RL ;
ROSENTHAL, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (01) :143-146
[9]  
TOSNOW RL, 1970, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V15, P338
[10]   ANALYZING DATA - SANCTIFICATION OR DETECTIVE WORK [J].
TUKEY, JW .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1969, 24 (02) :83-&