GENDER, MIGRATION AND URBAN-DEVELOPMENT IN COSTA-RICA - THE CASE OF GUANACASTE

被引:18
作者
CHANT, S
机构
[1] Department of Geography, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, Houghton Street
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0016-7185(91)90010-N
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper explores the reasons for urban growth in a peripheral region of Central America: Guanacaste province, north-west Costa Rica. While one of the major factors responsible for urbanisation in other parts of Latin America has been the expansion of economic activities in urban areas, the continued dominance of rural employment among the poor in Guanacasteco towns and high rates of seasonal out-migration to labour markets elsewhere in the country suggest that other factors may be more important. On the basis of an in-depth survey of 350 low-income households in three towns in the province, Liberia, Canas, and Santa Cruz, this paper finds that rural-urban movement in Guanacaste is much more strongly linked to the reproductive (e.g. housing, welfare) needs of household survival, than productive (e.g. employment, income) imperatives. The spatial divisions of labour which arise between household members in these different aspects of survival closely correspond with gender divisions of labour: men form the bulk of seasonal labour migrants, while women tend to remain behind in the towns to manage domestic work and child-care. This paper is concerned to explore the reasons for these associations, and their implications for women. In highlighting the importance of taking gender into account to explain the increasingly differentiated nature of urban growth in Latin America, this paper also stresses the need to examine in greater depth the factors contributing to current patterns of gender-selective migration in the continent. © 1991.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 253
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
[41]  
MARTEN FC, 1987, AUG C EST INV CIENT
[42]  
*MIN PLAN POL EC, 1988, SER PLAN, V20
[43]  
*MIN PLAN POL EC, 1984, PLAN MAESTR REG CHOR
[44]  
*MIN PLAN POL EC, 1988, SER PLAN, V17
[45]  
*MIN PLAN POL EC, 1989, SER PLAN, V22
[46]  
*MIN PLAN POL EC, 1988, DIR PLAN NAC REG CHO
[47]  
*OF PLAN NAC POL E, 1981, DIM PROBR EST POBR R
[48]  
PORTES A, 1989, LAT AM RES REV, V24, P7
[49]  
QUIROZ T, 1984, AVANCES INVESTIGACIO, V51
[50]  
RADCLIFFE S, 1991, IN PRESS REV RADICAL