GENOTOXIC EFFECTS OF SELECTED PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS

被引:46
作者
REISENBICHLER, H [1 ]
ECKL, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] SALZBURG UNIV,DIV GENET & DEV BIOL,HELLBRUNNERSTR 34,A-5020 SALZBURG,AUSTRIA
来源
MUTATION RESEARCH | 1993年 / 286卷 / 02期
关键词
GENOTOXICITY OF PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS; PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS; GENOTOXICITY; NAFENOPIN; CIPROFIBRATE; DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL)ADIPATE;
D O I
10.1016/0027-5107(93)90177-H
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Peroxisome proliferators, a class of structurally dissimilar chemicals including hypolipidemic drugs and industrial plasticizers, have been shown to be associated with hepatocarcinogenesis although an initiating effect could not yet be demonstrated in the cell systems utilized. For this reason the genotoxic potential of the peroxisome proliferators nafenopin, ciprofibrate and di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate (DEHA) was determined in primary cultures of adult rat hepatocytes. To further test if these compounds are genotoxic per se or the genotoxic effect is due to peroxisome proliferation, the cultures were exposed for 3 and 51 h. Treatment for 3 h with the hypolipidemic drugs nafenopin and ciprofibrate induced statistically significant increases of SCE at concentrations greater-than-or-equal-to 30 and 100 muM respectively. At higher concentrations statistically significant increases of chromosomal aberrations (nafenopin: 100 muM; ciprofibrate: greater-than-or-equal-to 100 muM) and micronuclei (ciprofibrate: greater-than-or-equal-to 250 muM) were also found. The presence of peroxisome proliferators in the media until harvesting (51 h) did not significantly alter the dose response of SCE, micronuclei and chromosomal aberration induction by ciprofibrate, while long-term exposure to nafenopin resulted in statistically significant increases of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei at concentrations greater-than-or-equal-to 30 muM. The differences were statistically significant at 30 and 100 muM for micronuclei, and at 30 muM for chromosomal aberrations. Neither short- nor long-term exposure to DEHA produced a significant genotoxic effect up to 200 muM. The peroxisome proliferators tested were not cytotoxic at any concentration, as determined by mitotic index. These results clearly demonstrate that the peroxisome proliferators nafenopin and ciprofibrate can cause genotoxic effects in primary cultures of adult rat hepatocytes. The comparison of short- and long-term exposure does not suggest a strong correlation between the induction of peroxisome proliferation and genotoxicity, since long-term exposure did not significantly alter the dose response and - except for nafenopin - the extent of the genotoxic effects.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 144
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]  
GOEL SK, 1986, CANCER RES, V46, P1324
[22]   PEROXISOME PROLIFERATION IN PRIMARY CULTURES OF RAT HEPATOCYTES [J].
GRAY, TJB ;
LAKE, BG ;
BEAMAND, JA ;
FOSTER, JR ;
GANGOLLI, SD .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 1983, 67 (01) :15-25
[23]   P-32-POSTLABELING ANALYSIS OF PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-DNA ADDUCT FORMATION IN RAT-LIVER INVIVO AND HEPATOCYTES INVITRO [J].
GUPTA, RC ;
GOEL, SK ;
EARLEY, K ;
SINGH, B ;
REDDY, JK .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1985, 6 (06) :933-936
[24]   NATURE OF HEPATOMEGALIC EFFECT PRODUCED BY ETHYL-CHLOROPHENOXY-ISOBUTYRATE IN RAT [J].
HESS, R ;
STAUBLI, W ;
RIESS, W .
NATURE, 1965, 208 (5013) :856-+
[25]  
HUBER W, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P1789
[26]   INDUCTION OF SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE AND MICRONUCLEI IN PRIMARY CULTURES OF RAT AND HUMAN HEPATOCYTES BY THE PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR, WY-14,643 [J].
HWANG, JJ ;
HSIA, MTS ;
JIRTLE, RL .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1993, 286 (02) :123-133
[27]  
ISSEMANN I, 1990, NATURE, V347, P645, DOI 10.1038/347645a0
[28]  
KASAI H, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P2603
[29]   EVALUATION OF DI-(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE AND ITS MAJOR METABOLITES IN THE AMES TEST AND L5178Y MOUSE LYMPHOMA MUTAGENICITY ASSAY [J].
KIRBY, PE ;
PIZZARELLO, RF ;
LAWLOR, TE ;
HAWORTH, SR ;
HODGSON, JR .
ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1983, 5 (05) :657-663
[30]   ASSESSMENT OF THE MUTAGENICITY OF PHTHALATE-ESTERS [J].
KOZUMBO, WJ ;
KROLL, R ;
RUBIN, RJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1982, 45 (NOV) :103-109