TRACHEOSTOMY VENTILATION VERSUS DIAPHRAGMATIC PACEMAKER VENTILATION IN HIGH SPINAL-CORD INJURY

被引:24
作者
ESCLARIN, A
BRAVO, P
ARROYO, O
MAZAIRA, J
GARRIDO, H
ALCARAZ, MA
机构
[1] Hospital Nacional de Paraplèjicos, Finca La Peraleda s/n, Toledo
来源
PARAPLEGIA | 1994年 / 32卷 / 10期
关键词
SPINAL CORD INJURY; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; ELECTROPHRENIC NERVE STIMULATION; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; QUALITY OF LIFE;
D O I
10.1038/sc.1994.111
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We have made a retrospective comparative study of patients with spinal cord injury, nine with a diaphragmatic pacemaker and 13 with mechanical ventilation. Clinical outcome, cost and subjective satisfaction with both modalities have been evaluated. The functional status was the same with both types of treatment. Proper management of an electric wheelchair and optimal phonation were attained, respectively, in 100% and 89% of pacers and in 77% and 77% of mechanically ventilated. The rate of hospital discharge and satisfaction with the treatment were significantly better for pacers. The time devoted to ventilatory assistance and cost were also more favourable in this group.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 693
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[21]  
Donovan W.H., Taylor N., Ventilatory Assistance In Quadriplegia, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 54, pp. 485-488, (1973)
[22]  
Burnhan L., Werner G., The High-Level Tetraplegic: Psychological Survival And Adjustment, Paraplegia, 16, pp. 184-192, (1978)