ENHANCED PRECISION WITH DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY

被引:110
作者
MAZESS, R
CHESNUT, CH
MCCLUNG, M
GENANT, H
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT RADIOL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[2] UNIV WASHINGTON,SCH MED,DEPT MED,DIV NUCL MED,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[3] UNIV WASHINGTON,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,DIV NUCL MED,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[4] PROVIDENCE MED CTR,CTR METAB BONE DISORDERS,PORTLAND,OR 97213
关键词
SPINE; FEMUR; DENSITOMETRY; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY;
D O I
10.1007/BF00296209
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Repeat spine and femur measurements (5 per case) were done on 19 subjects with the DPX-L densitometer operating at 3 mA giving a radiation flux fourfold higher than the earlier DPX model. The precision for spine bone mineral density (BMD) was about 0.55% (L2-L4) and 0.48% (L1-L4) for 2-minute scans (2.4 mrem). The precision was only slightly lower (0.4-0.5%) for 4-minute scans (5 mrem) in a subset of 11 subjects. There was a slight precision advantage for the larger L1-L4 area compared with L2-L4 for 2-minute scans, but no advantage for 4-minute scans. The precision for femoral neck BMD was 1.00 and 0.85% for 2- and 4-minute scans, respectively, with proper positioning. The corresponding values for the Ward's triangle region of the femur were 2.6 and 1.5%. The precision of spine scans was influenced chiefly by variable region location. The precision of femur scans was affected by both patient positioning and location of the region. The 4-minute scans minimized the number of operator changes necessary for analysis. Precision errors can be reduced by up to 50% with utilization of the higher flux, but this does not obviate the need for care in patient positioning and scan analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 17
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   INTERSITE COMPARISON OF THE HOLOGIC QDR-1000 DUAL ENERGY X-RAY BONE DENSITOMETER [J].
BLAKE, GM ;
TONG, CM ;
FOGELMAN, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (761) :440-446
[2]   PRECISION AND STABILITY OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS [J].
JOHNSON, J ;
DAWSONHUGHES, B .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 49 (03) :174-178
[3]   QUANTITATIVE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS DUAL PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
KELLY, TL ;
SLOVIK, DM ;
SCHOENFELD, DA ;
NEER, RM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1988, 67 (04) :839-844
[4]  
Lilley J, 1991, Osteoporos Int, V1, P141, DOI 10.1007/BF01625443
[5]   PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY BONE DENSITOMETER [J].
MAZESS, R ;
COLLICK, B ;
TREMPE, J ;
BARDEN, H ;
HANSON, J .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 44 (03) :228-232
[6]  
MAZESS RB, 1990, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V21, P51
[7]  
MCCLUNG M, 1989, 7TH INT WORKSH BON D
[8]  
ORWOLL ES, J BONE MINER RES, V6, P191
[9]  
REID DM, 1990, OSTEOPOROSIS 1990, P575
[10]   DUAL-ENERGY RADIOGRAPHIC ABSORPTIOMETRY FOR BONE DENSITOMETRY - CURRENT STATUS AND PERSPECTIVE [J].
SARTORIS, DJ ;
RESNICK, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 152 (02) :241-246