SOME POPULATION CONSEQUENCES OF VARIATION IN PREFERENCE AMONG INDIVIDUAL PREDATORS

被引:29
作者
SHERRATT, TN [1 ]
MACDOUGALL, AD [1 ]
机构
[1] DEPT ZOOL,OXFORD OX1 3PS,ENGLAND
关键词
VARIATION; PREFERENCE; FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION; ANTI-APOSTATIC SELECTION; NOTONECTA; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1095-8312.1995.tb01053.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A number of foraging studies have demonstrated that populations of predators rarely consist of individuals with identical preferences for particular types of prey. Variation among predators can lead to frequency-dependent changes in population preference, because those predators that prefer the rarer type of prey generally have the greatest influence on population preference. In this study we develop a series of theoretical models which demonstrate how anti-apostatic selection (i.e. selection against the rare form) can arise out of (a) bimodal and (b) normal variation in preference among individuals of the same species. We show that population level anti-apostatic selection can occur even when individual predators show proapostatic selection (i.e. selection against the common form). Furthermore, patterns of population prey selection that arise out of variation in preference can potentially be pro-apostatic over one range of relative densities and anti-apostatic over another range of relative densities. Finally, we examine a case study involving predation by female waterboatmen Notonecta glauca and show that the variation in preference in this species is large enough to generate higher anti-apostatic selection than would be expected from the diet selected by the average individual.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 107
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   SELECTION BY PASSERINE BIRDS IS ANTI-APOSTATIC AT HIGH PREY DENSITY [J].
ALLEN, JA ;
ANDERSON, KP .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1984, 23 (2-3) :237-246
[2]  
ARNOLD SJ, 1981, EVOLUTION, V35, P489, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1981.tb04912.x
[3]   PREY SIZE SELECTION BY THE MOSQUITOFISH - RELATION TO OPTIMAL DIET THEORY [J].
BENCE, JR ;
MURDOCH, WW .
ECOLOGY, 1986, 67 (02) :324-336
[4]   PREDATOR-PREY THEORY AND VARIABILITY [J].
CHESSON, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1978, 9 :323-347
[5]   VARIABLE PREDATORS AND SWITCHING BEHAVIOR [J].
CHESSON, PL .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1984, 26 (01) :1-26
[6]  
DeAngelis DL., 2018, INDIVIDUAL BASED MOD, DOI 10.1201/9781351073462
[7]   PREDATION STRATEGIES, RESOURCE PARTITIONING AND HABITAT SELECTION IN NOTONECTA (HEMIPTERA, HETEROPTERA) [J].
GILLER, PS ;
MCNEILL, S .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1981, 50 (03) :789-808
[8]   THE FUNCTIONAL BASIS OF FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT FOOD SELECTION [J].
GREENWOOD, JJD .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1984, 23 (2-3) :177-199
[9]   NEW COMPUTER-MODELS UNIFY ECOLOGICAL THEORY - COMPUTER-SIMULATIONS SHOW THAT MANY ECOLOGICAL PATTERNS CAN BE EXPLAINED BY INTERACTIONS AMONG INDIVIDUAL ORGANISMS [J].
HUSTON, M ;
DEANGELIS, D ;
POST, W .
BIOSCIENCE, 1988, 38 (10) :682-691
[10]   THE RISE OF THE INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL IN ECOLOGY [J].
JUDSON, OP .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1994, 9 (01) :9-14