EVALUATION OF CLOSED VS OPEN SYSTEMS FOR THE DELIVERY OF PEPTIDE-BASED ENTERAL DIETS

被引:24
作者
WAGNER, DR [1 ]
ELMORE, MF [1 ]
KNOLL, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] ST FRANCIS HOSP & MED CTR, BEECH GROVE, IN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0148607194018005453
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: The study was designed to quantitate factors such as preparation time, waste, and contamination associated with three different feeding systems for peptide-based diets, and to determine appropriate hang times. Methods: Intensive care unit patients were randomized to receive a peptide-based diet in 1500-mt prefilled, sterile closed-system containers (CS) infused more than 24 hours, as open systems decanted from cans (OS-Can), or as open systems mixed from powder (OS-Powder). Open-system groups were provided a 12-hour supply twice daily in commercially clean 1-L bags with preattached sets. Samples were taken for culture during preparation and after infusion. Preparation time, initial and final microbial concentrations, and total waste were quantified. Results: Preparation time was significantly shorter for CS than for OS-Can or for OS-Powder (2 minutes vs 7.5 minutes vs 13.0 minutes). initially, 100% of the OS-Powder and 30% of the OS-Can bags were contaminated, with significant contamination exceeding 10(4) colony-forming units/mL in 40% and in 5% of the bags, respectively. On final culture, significant contamination occurred in only 2% of the CS bags compared with 83% of the OS-Powder and 60% of the OS-Can bags. Average time from potential initial contamination to final culture in CS was 49.9 hours vs 38.8 hours for OS-Can and 32 hours for OS-Powder. Total waste was greater in CS than in OS-Can or OS-Powder but could be eliminated by extending allowable hang times. Conclusions: Nonvented closed-delivery containers may be safely infused for up to 48 hours. They are associated with reduced labor and contamination.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 457
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
ANDERTON A, 1993, CLIN NUTR, V12, P16
[2]   DECANTING - A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION OF ENTERAL FEEDS [J].
ANDERTON, A ;
AIDOO, KE .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1990, 9 (03) :157-162
[3]   BACTERIAL-CONTAMINATION OF CONTINUOUSLY INFUSED ENTERAL ALIMENTATION WITH NEEDLE CATHETER JEJUNOSTOMY - CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
BALDWIN, BA ;
ZAGOREN, AJ ;
ROSE, N .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1984, 8 (01) :30-33
[4]   MICROORGANISMS AND DIARRHEA IN ENTERALLY FED INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT PATIENTS [J].
BELKNAP, DC ;
DAVIDSON, LJ ;
FLOURNOY, DJ .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1990, 14 (06) :622-628
[5]   ENTERAL FEEDS CONTAMINATED WITH ENTEROBACTER CLOACAE AS A CAUSE OF SEPTICEMIA [J].
CASEWELL, MW ;
COOPER, JE ;
WEBSTER, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 282 (6268) :973-973
[6]   BACTERIAL SAFETY OF RECONSTITUTED CONTINUOUS DRIP TUBE-FEEDING [J].
HOSTETLER, C ;
LIPMAN, TO ;
GERAGHTY, M ;
PARKER, RH .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1982, 6 (03) :232-235
[7]   AN OUTBREAK OF SERIOUS KLEBSIELLA INFECTIONS RELATED TO FOOD BLENDERS [J].
KIDDY, K ;
JOSSE, E ;
GRIFFIN, N .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1987, 9 (02) :191-193
[8]   CONTAMINATED ENTERAL NUTRITION SOLUTIONS AS A CAUSE OF NOSOCOMIAL BLOOD-STREAM INFECTION - A STUDY USING PLASMID FINGERPRINTING [J].
LEVY, J ;
VANLAETHEM, Y ;
VERHAEGEN, G ;
PERPETE, C ;
BUTZLER, JP ;
WENZEL, RP .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1989, 13 (03) :228-234
[9]   MECHANISM OF PREVENTION OF POSTBURN HYPERMETABOLISM AND CATABOLISM BY EARLY ENTERAL FEEDING [J].
MOCHIZUKI, H ;
TROCKI, O ;
DOMINIONI, L ;
BRACKETT, KA ;
JOFFE, SN ;
ALEXANDER, JW .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 200 (03) :297-310
[10]   BACTERIAL-CONTAMINATION OF ENTERAL FEEDS AS A POSSIBLE RISK OF NOSOCOMIAL INFECTION [J].
NAVAJAS, MFC ;
CHACON, DJ ;
SOLVAS, JFG ;
VARGAS, RG .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1992, 21 (02) :111-120