EVALUATION OF CLOSED VS OPEN SYSTEMS FOR THE DELIVERY OF PEPTIDE-BASED ENTERAL DIETS

被引:24
作者
WAGNER, DR [1 ]
ELMORE, MF [1 ]
KNOLL, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] ST FRANCIS HOSP & MED CTR, BEECH GROVE, IN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0148607194018005453
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: The study was designed to quantitate factors such as preparation time, waste, and contamination associated with three different feeding systems for peptide-based diets, and to determine appropriate hang times. Methods: Intensive care unit patients were randomized to receive a peptide-based diet in 1500-mt prefilled, sterile closed-system containers (CS) infused more than 24 hours, as open systems decanted from cans (OS-Can), or as open systems mixed from powder (OS-Powder). Open-system groups were provided a 12-hour supply twice daily in commercially clean 1-L bags with preattached sets. Samples were taken for culture during preparation and after infusion. Preparation time, initial and final microbial concentrations, and total waste were quantified. Results: Preparation time was significantly shorter for CS than for OS-Can or for OS-Powder (2 minutes vs 7.5 minutes vs 13.0 minutes). initially, 100% of the OS-Powder and 30% of the OS-Can bags were contaminated, with significant contamination exceeding 10(4) colony-forming units/mL in 40% and in 5% of the bags, respectively. On final culture, significant contamination occurred in only 2% of the CS bags compared with 83% of the OS-Powder and 60% of the OS-Can bags. Average time from potential initial contamination to final culture in CS was 49.9 hours vs 38.8 hours for OS-Can and 32 hours for OS-Powder. Total waste was greater in CS than in OS-Can or OS-Powder but could be eliminated by extending allowable hang times. Conclusions: Nonvented closed-delivery containers may be safely infused for up to 48 hours. They are associated with reduced labor and contamination.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 457
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[11]   BACTERIAL-CONTAMINATION OF RECONSTITUTED AND COMMERCIALLY PREPARED ENTERAL FEEDS [J].
NUGENT, M ;
HANSELL, DT ;
GRAY, GR .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1987, 6 (01) :21-24
[12]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF 2-LITER PREPACKED ENTERAL DIET DELIVERY SYSTEM - A CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
REES, RGP ;
MED, B ;
RYAN, J ;
ATTRILL, HA ;
SILK, DBA .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1988, 12 (03) :274-277
[13]   ENTERAL HYPERALIMENTATION AS A SOURCE OF NOSOCOMIAL INFECTION [J].
THURN, J ;
CROSSLEY, K ;
GERDTS, A ;
MAKI, M ;
JOHNSON, J .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1990, 15 (03) :203-217
[14]  
Wagner D R, 1992, Nutr Clin Pract, V7, P113
[15]  
White W T 3rd, 1979, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, V3, P459