RESEARCH ON STANDARDS FOR PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

被引:26
作者
NORCINI, JJ
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1177/016327879401700203
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this article is to outline an agenda for research on standards for professional licensure and certification examinations. To avoid confusion, scores are defined as content-based decisions about the correctness of responses, and standards refer to the educational/social decisions about how many questions need to be answered correctly to pass. Standards are the focus of this article. The two major types of standards, relative and absolute, are described and the major standard-setting methods for each are presented. Some of the published results in four different areas are reviewed: (a) basis of the judgments, (b) efficiency of the process, (c) group effects, and (d) content and expertise effects. Topics for future research in all four areas are identified.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 177
页数:18
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Angoff W. H., 1971, ED MEASUREMENT
[3]  
BOWMER MI, IN PRESS 5TH P CAMBR
[4]   INFLUENCE OF TYPE OF JUDGE, NORMATIVE INFORMATION, AND DISCUSSION ON STANDARDS RECOMMENDED FOR THE NATIONAL TEACHER EXAMINATIONS [J].
BUSCH, JC ;
JAEGER, RM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1990, 27 (02) :145-163
[5]   A COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING MINIMUM STANDARDS ON THE NATIONAL TEACHER EXAMINATIONS [J].
CROSS, LH ;
IMPARA, JC ;
FRARY, RB ;
JAEGER, RM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1984, 21 (02) :113-129
[6]  
Darling-Hammond L., 1984, COMMISSION REPORTS C
[7]  
Ebel RL, 1979, ESSENTIALS ED MEASUR
[8]   CLINICAL JUDGMENT - PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH AND MEDICAL-PRACTICE [J].
ELSTEIN, AS .
SCIENCE, 1976, 194 (4266) :696-700
[9]   NARRATIVES OF CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION [J].
ENGEL, JD .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1994, 17 (02) :222-235