Comparison between usual and low doses of insulin in the assessment of insulin sensitivity with a short insulin tolerance test in obese women

被引:7
作者
Gonzalez-Ortiz, M
Martinez-Abundis, E
Pascoe-Gonzalez, S
机构
[1] Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Ctr Med Nacl Occidente, Unidad Invest Med & Epidemiol Clin, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] Univ Guadalajara, Ctr Univ Ciencias Salud, Dept Fisiol, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
来源
ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH | 1999年 / 30卷 / 05期
关键词
insulin tolerance test; insulin sensitivity; low-dose insulin;
D O I
10.1016/S0188-0128(99)00044-5
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background. The objective of this study is to compare, in obese women, the assessment of insulin sensitivity and the presence of hypoglycemia between the usual and low doses of insulin used in the short insulin tolerance test (ITT). Methods. The patients were 12 obese women on whom a randomized, double-masked, auto-controlled clinical trial was carried out. An ITT was performed on each volunteer in duplicate with insulin at 0.1 (usual dose) or 0.05 U/kg (low dose). Results. The constant for the rate serum glucose disappearance calculated for the ITT was not significantly different between both tests (4.3 +/- 05 vs. 4.4 +/- 1.0%/min, usual dose and low dose of insulin, respectively; p = 0.49). There was a significant correlation between both tests (r = 0.59, r(2) = 0.34, p < 0.95). Differences between both tests had estimated limits of agreement of -0.97 to 0.65%/min. Between tests, the coefficient of variation was 16%, No subject developed hypoglycemia with any of the ITT measurements employing usual or low doses of insulin, Conclusions. We recommend a low dose of insulin in the assessment of insulin sensitivity with ITT in obese people. In our study usual and low doses of insulin used in the ITT were safe and had similar results between both doses for assessing insulin sensitivity. (C) 1999 IMSS, Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 387
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]   ESTIMATES OF INVIVO INSULIN ACTION IN MAN - COMPARISON OF INSULIN TOLERANCE-TESTS WITH EUGLYCEMIC AND HYPERGLYCEMIC GLUCOSE CLAMP STUDIES [J].
BONORA, E ;
MOGHETTI, P ;
ZANCANARO, C ;
CIGOLINI, M ;
QUERENA, M ;
CACCIATORI, V ;
CORGNATI, A ;
MUGGEO, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1989, 68 (02) :374-378
[3]   VALIDATION OF THE LOW-DOSE SHORT INSULIN TOLERANCE-TEST FOR EVALUATION OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY [J].
GELDING, SV ;
ROBINSON, S ;
LOWE, S ;
NITHTHYANANTHAN, R ;
JOHNSTON, DG .
CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1994, 40 (05) :611-615
[4]  
Gonzalez-Ortiz M, 1998, DIABETES NUTR METAB, V11, P136
[5]   REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE SHORT INSULIN TOLERANCE-TEST [J].
HIRST, S ;
PHILLIPS, DIW ;
VINES, SK ;
CLARK, PM ;
HALES, CN .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1993, 10 (09) :839-842
[6]   REGIONAL ADIPOSITY AND MORBIDITY [J].
KISSEBAH, AH ;
KRAKOWER, GR .
PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1994, 74 (04) :761-811
[7]  
NESTLER JE, 1994, SCI AM, V271, P58
[8]  
Young RP, 1996, DIABETIC MED, V13, P429, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199605)13:5<429::AID-DIA98>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-K