Innovation generation process Applying the adopter categorization model and concept of "chasm" to better understand social and behavioral issues

被引:17
作者
Bernstein, Boaz [1 ]
Singh, Prakash J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Management, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Management, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Behaviour; Organizational theory; Innovation; Biotechnology; Australia;
D O I
10.1108/14601060810889017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the social and behavioral actions, activities and practices in order to group them together to create behavior-based profiles that characterize the various stages of the innovation generation processes within organizations. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative data were collected from nine Australian companies from the biotechnology sector. Using the grounded theory approach to data analysis, labels from Rogers' adopter categorization model were used to broadly identify and classify typical actions, activities, practices and behaviors exhibited within organizations that can be described as being "innovator", "early adopter", "early majority", "late majority" or "laggard" types. Further, Moore's metaphor of "chasm" was applied to explore the nature of difficulties that organizations face in converting innovative ideas into commercially successful products and services. Findings - The use of the labels from the categories of the adopter categorization model enabled suitable behavior-based profiles to be developed. Originality/value - The use of the adopter categorization model provides a fuller and richer insight into the innovation generation process. The model can also be used to assess more holistically the viability of innovations as they progress from inception to commercialization.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / +
页数:24
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Barclay I, 1994, LEADERSHIP ORG DEV J, V15, P33
[2]   An integrated innovation process model based on practices of Australian biotechnology firms [J].
Bernstein, B ;
Singh, PJ .
TECHNOVATION, 2006, 26 (5-6) :561-572
[3]   AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE NEW PRODUCT PROCESS - STEPS, DEFICIENCIES, AND IMPACT [J].
COOPER, RG ;
KLEINSCHMIDT, EJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1986, 3 (02) :71-85
[4]   The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations [J].
Damanpour, F .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2001, 38 (01) :45-65
[5]  
Drucker PF, 1998, HARVARD BUS REV, V76, P149
[6]   BUILDING THEORIES FROM CASE-STUDY RESEARCH [J].
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :532-550
[7]   ACCELERATING ADAPTIVE PROCESSES - PRODUCT INNOVATION IN THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INDUSTRY [J].
EISENHARDT, KM ;
TABRIZI, BN .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1995, 40 (01) :84-110
[8]   Consumer attitudes towards domestic solar power systems [J].
Faiers, Adam ;
Neame, Charles .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (14) :1797-1806
[9]   Organizational innovation adoption - A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research [J].
Frambach, RT ;
Schillewaert, N .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2002, 55 (02) :163-176
[10]  
Glaser B., 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO