RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RISK-FACTORS FOR SPRUCE BEETLE OUTBREAKS

被引:47
作者
REYNOLDS, KM [1 ]
HOLSTEN, EH [1 ]
机构
[1] US FOREST SERV, ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1139/x94-268
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Nine factors were initially suggested by spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kby.)) experts in Alaska as potentially important in determining the risk of a spruce beetle outbreak in stands. Factors suggested were stand hazard, size and trend of spruce beetle population in neighboring stands, degree-days in the past June, total rainfall in the past summer, and availability of four types of breeding material. Risk factors were organized into a hierarchical model of spruce beetle risk, and the relative importance of factors for determining risk was analyzed in three stages with the analytic hierarchy process. This process derives subjective estimates of factor importance values through a process of pair-wise comparisons. Analysis in stage 1 involved independent responses of two experts from Alaska. In stage 2, three experts from Alaska provided responses as a group. In stage 3, five experts, representing Alaska, British Columbia, and the Rocky Mountain region, provided responses as a group. In the final stage of analysis, stand hazard and windthrown trees were identified as the two most important factors determining risk of a spruce beetle outbreak. Hazard and windthrow were considered about equally important and together accounted for almost two-thirds of the total allocation of importance values among risk factors. The analytic hierarchy process is an effective method for eliciting expert knowledge and can be a useful tool for development of expert systems in natural resource management, where even expert knowledge is often incomplete.
引用
收藏
页码:2089 / 2095
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[2]   DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY AND FUZZINESS IN DEVELOPMENT-PLANNING - A SIMULATION OF HIGH-TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL-LOCATION DECISION-MAKING BY THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
BANAIKASHANI, AR .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1990, 22 (09) :1183-1203
[3]  
BRUNK HD, 1975, INTRO MATH STATISTIC
[4]  
DYER EDA, 1971, BCX62 CAN FOR SERV P
[5]  
HOLSTEN EH, 1991, 127 FOR INS DIS LEAF
[6]  
KENAGA CB, 1974, PRINCIPLES PHYTOPATH
[7]   A CONSISTENCY TEST FOR AHP DECISION MAKERS [J].
LANE, EF ;
VERDINI, WA .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1989, 20 (03) :575-590
[8]  
MENDOZA GA, 1989, FOREST SCI, V35, P481
[9]  
PAINE TD, 1983, ROLE HOST POPULATION, P210
[10]   CLASSIFICATION OF SPRUCE BEETLE HAZARD IN LUTZ SPRUCE (PICEA X LUTZII) STANDS ON THE KENAI PENINSULA, ALASKA [J].
REYNOLDS, KM ;
HOLSTEN, EH .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1994, 24 (05) :1015-1021