COMPARISON OF KAOPECTATE WITH BARIUM FOR NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE ENTERIC CONTRAST AT MR IMAGING

被引:41
作者
MITCHELL, DG [1 ]
VINITSKI, S [1 ]
MOHAMED, FB [1 ]
MAMMONE, JF [1 ]
HAIDET, K [1 ]
RIFKIN, MD [1 ]
机构
[1] THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV,JEFFERSON MED COLL,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19107
关键词
ABDOMEN; MR STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; INTESTINES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR); CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.181.2.1924791
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In an evaluation of safe, inexpensive, orally administered contrast agents for use at magnetic resonance imaging, different concentrations of the clay agents kaolin-pectate and attapulgite were compared in an in vitro phantom by performing spin-echo imaging with variable echo times to estimate T2 relaxation time. Additional phantoms containing from 0% to 100% attapulgite or barium preparations were compared by using spin-echo and spoiled-gradient-echo techniques to estimate T1, T2, and T2* relaxation times. In vivo spin-echo and gradient-echo images were obtained of 10 healthy volunteers and of five patients with pancreatic disease after oral administration of 12-16 oz of attapulgite preparation. T1 and T2 relaxation times obtained with use of attapulgite were slightly lower than those obtained with kaolin-pectate at both 50% and 25% concentrations. Compared with barium, attapulgite had shorter T1, T2, and T2* relaxation times, and concentration-dependent relaxivity was greater by nearly an order of magnitude. All subjects were able to drink the attapulgite, and the only complaints were of bad taste and mildly loose stools.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 480
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE EVALUATION OF FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS [J].
BARAKOS, JA ;
GOLDBERG, HI ;
BROWN, JJ ;
GILBERT, TJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1990, 15 (02) :93-101
[2]   LIVER AND ABDOMINAL SCREENING IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER - CT VERSUS MR IMAGING [J].
CHEZMAR, JL ;
RUMANCIK, WM ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
HULNICK, DH ;
NELSON, RC ;
BERNARDINO, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (01) :43-47
[3]   ORAL CONTRAST AGENTS IN CT OF THE ABDOMEN [J].
GARRETT, PR ;
MESHKOV, SL ;
PERLMUTTER, GS .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 153 (02) :545-546
[4]   FERRITE PARTICLES FOR BOWEL CONTRAST IN MR IMAGING - DESIGN ISSUES AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES [J].
HAHN, PF ;
STARK, DD ;
SAINI, S ;
LEWIS, JM ;
WITTENBERG, J ;
FERRUCCI, JT .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (01) :37-41
[5]   MR IMAGING OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT - VALUE OF GD-DTPA [J].
LANIADO, M ;
KORNMESSER, W ;
HAMM, B ;
CLAUSS, W ;
WEINMANN, HJ ;
FELIX, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1988, 150 (04) :817-821
[6]   BARIUM-SULFATE SUSPENSION AS A NEGATIVE ORAL MRI CONTRAST AGENT - INVITRO AND HUMAN OPTIMIZATION STUDIES [J].
LI, KCP ;
TART, RP ;
FITZSIMMONS, JR ;
STORM, BL ;
MAO, JT ;
ROLFES, RJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1991, 9 (02) :141-150
[7]  
LISTERUD J, 1990, BOOK ABSTRACTS SOC M, P590
[8]   GASTROINTESTINAL CONTRAST AGENTS - A DIAMAGNETIC APPROACH [J].
LISTINSKY, JJ ;
BRYANT, RG .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1988, 8 (03) :285-292
[9]   PERFLUOROCHEMICALS AS GASTROINTESTINAL CONTRAST AGENTS FOR MR IMAGING - PRELIMINARY STUDIES IN RATS AND HUMANS [J].
MATTREY, RF ;
HAJEK, PC ;
GYLYSMORIN, VM ;
BAKER, LL ;
MARTIN, J ;
LONG, DC ;
LONG, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 148 (06) :1259-1263
[10]   LIVER AND PANCREAS - IMPROVED SPIN-ECHO T1 CONTRAST BY SHORTER ECHO TIME AND FAT SUPPRESSION AT 1.5-T [J].
MITCHELL, DG ;
VINITSKI, S ;
SAPONARO, S ;
TASCIYAN, T ;
BURK, DL ;
RIFKIN, MD .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (01) :67-71