The Pandora's box of social integration mechanisms Can they make it more difficult to realize absorptive capacity?

被引:16
作者
Armstrong, Craig E. [1 ]
Lengnick-Hall, Cynthia A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Management & Mkt, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ Texas San Antonio, Dept Management, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
关键词
Self managing teams; Team working; Absorptive capacity; Social integration mechanisms; Competitive advantage; Cross-functional teams; Participate decision making;
D O I
10.1108/17554251311296530
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to perform empirical tests to explore the influence of social integration mechanisms on organizations' absorptive capacities theorized by Zahra and George. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses a cross-sectional design to test the relationships between potential absorptive capacity, three social integration mechanisms (cross-functional teams, participation in decision making, and self-managing teams), and realized absorptive capacity, in a sample of 92 organizations that bid competitively to provide products and services to a US university. Findings - An organization's use of cross-functional teams is negatively related to its realized absorptive capacity and negatively moderates the relationship between potential and realized absorptive capacity. Self-managing teams negatively moderate the relationship between an organization's potential absorptive capacity and its realized absorptive capacity. Research limitations/implications - The cross-sectional design allows tests of relatedness but does not support cause-and-effect inferences. Practical implications - Managers who follow the prescriptive implications of using social integration mechanisms to enhance their organization's absorptive capacity may actually hinder it. The type of social integration mechanism is an important consideration for managers of firm strategies. Originality/value - This study extends and challenges the literature on absorptive capacity through its empirical analysis of the role of social integration mechanisms on an organization's absorptive capacity. Social integration mechanisms can have mixed moderating effects on the absorptive capacity development process, and potential absorptive capacity is not easily transformed into realized absorptive capacity. This study expands the context of absorptive capacity beyond R&D settings and incorporates a task environment that allows a direct linking of inputs and outputs.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 26
页数:23
相关论文
共 125 条
[91]  
Pinto J. K., 1988, PROJ MANAG J, V19, P67
[92]   ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF PROJECT TEAM CROSS-FUNCTIONAL COOPERATION [J].
PINTO, MB ;
PINTO, JK ;
PRESCOTT, JE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) :1281-1297
[93]   Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries [J].
Santamaria, Lluis ;
Jesus Nieto, Maria ;
Barge-Gil, Andres .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (03) :507-517
[94]  
Shaw M.E., 1981, GROUP DYNAMICS PSYCH, VThird edition
[95]   Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure [J].
Sheremata, WA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2000, 25 (02) :389-408
[96]   THE EFFECTS OF REPEAT COLLABORATION ON CREATIVE ABRASION [J].
Skilton, Paul F. ;
Dooley, Kevin J. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 35 (01) :118-134
[97]   Product Development Team Stability and New Product Advantage: The Role of Decision-Making Processes [J].
Slotegraaf, Rebecca J. ;
Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2011, 75 (01) :96-108
[98]   Relationships of participative leadership with relational demography variables: a multi-level perspective [J].
Somech, A .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 24 (08) :1003-1018
[99]  
Stock G.N., 2001, J HIGH TECHNOLOGY MA, V12, P77, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00040-7
[100]   An Examination of the Relationship Between Absorptive Capacity and Organizational Learning, and a Proposed Integration [J].
Sun, Peter Y. T. ;
Anderson, Marc H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2010, 12 (02) :130-150