BONE-MINERAL DENSITY OF THE SPINE AND THE HIP MEASURED WITH DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY - NORMAL RANGE AND FRACTURE THRESHOLD FOR WESTERN-EUROPEAN (BELGIAN) POSTMENOPAUSAL FEMALES

被引:25
作者
REGINSTER, JY
JANSSEN, C
DEROISY, R
ZEGELS, B
ALBERT, A
FRANCHIMONT, P
机构
[1] Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC
[2] Centre Universitaire d'Investigation du Métabolisme Osseux et du Cartilage Articulaire, University of Liège, Liège, 4020
关键词
OSTEOPOROSIS; MENOPAUSE; BONE MINERAL DENSITY; DUAL ENERGY; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY;
D O I
10.1007/BF02208087
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and the different regions of interest (ROI) of the hip were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 278 healthy Belgian postmenopausal women and 93 postmenopausal type I osteoporotic females in order to: a) determine the normal range for lumbar and hip BMD values; b) define an ''hypothetical'' fracture threshold in this population; c) determine the preferential region to be considered for clinical use in type I osteoporosis. In the normal subjects, there is a negative relationship (<0.001) between age or time elapsed since menopause (Tm) and BMD measured at the level of the spine or at the ROI of the hip. For the spine, evidence of a curvilinear relationship was assessed. Regressions of BMD at the hip as a function of age or time elapsed since menopause, were best fitted by a linear relationship. In the population of postmenopausal women who have experienced a vertebral crush fracture, no relationships were observed between spine BMD and age or Tm but the osteoporotic women had a spine BMD significantly lower compared to age-matched normal controls: Z-score = -1.2 +/- 0.6 (mean +/- SD) (p < 0.0001). Fracture threshold calculated as the 90th percentile of spine BMD measured in osteoporotic patients was 0.840 g/cm(2), corresponding to the mean value -1 SD for a population of women aged 51 years.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 75
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Kelly T.L., Slovik D.M., Neer R.M., Calibration and standardization of bone mineral densitometers, J Bone Miner Res, 4, pp. 663-669, (1989)
[2]  
Pouilles J.M., Ribot C., Que peut on attendre d'une mesure de la densité osseuse?, Rev Rhum Mal Osteoart, 56, pp. 479-486, (1989)
[3]  
Kanis J.A., The epidemiology of hip fracture in Europe. The ME-DOS study, Osteoporosis 1990, pp. 42-47, (1990)
[4]  
Chesnut C.H., Osteoporosis, a world-wide problem?, Osteoporosis 1990, pp. 33-35, (1990)
[5]  
Riggs B.L., Wahner H.W., Dunn W.L., Mazess R.B., Oxford K.P., Melton L.J., Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis, J Clin Invest, 67, pp. 328-335, (1981)
[6]  
Kellgren J.H., Atlas of standard radiographs of arthritis, The Epidemiology of Chronic Rheumatism Vol II, (1963)
[7]  
Dequeker J., Goris P., Uytterhoeven R., Osteoporosis and osteoarthritis: anthropometric distinctions, J Am Med Assoc, 249, pp. 1448-1451, (1982)
[8]  
Metz C.E., ROC methodology in radiologic imaging, Invest Radiol, 21, pp. 720-733, (1986)
[9]  
Newton-John H.F., Morgan D.B., Osteoporosis: disease or senescence?, Lancet, 1, pp. 232-233, (1968)
[10]  
Meunier P.J., Courpron P., Edouard C., Bernard J., Bringuier J., Vignon G., Physiological senile involution and pathological rarefaction of bone: quantitative and comparative histological data, Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2, pp. 239-256, (1973)