BETWEEN-COUNTRY COMPARABILITY OF CLINICAL-CHEMISTRY RESULTS - AN INTERNATIONAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF 17 ANALYTES IN 6 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES THROUGH EXISTING NATIONAL SCHEMES

被引:4
作者
JANSEN, RTP
BULLOCK, DG
VASSAULT, A
BAADENHUIJSEN, H
DELEENHEER, A
DUMONT, G
DEVERDIER, CH
ZENDER, R
机构
[1] ST RADBOUD HOSP,NIJMEGEN,NETHERLANDS
[2] LAB HOP,CH-2301 LA CHAUX DE FONDS,SWITZERLAND
[3] QUEEN ELIZABETH MED CTR,DEPT CLIN CHEM,BIRMINGHAM B15 2TH,W MIDLANDS,ENGLAND
[4] HOP NECKER ENFANTS MALAD,DEPT BIOCHEM A,F-75730 PARIS 15,FRANCE
[5] UNIV UPPSALA,DEPT CLIN CHEM,S-75185 UPPSALA,SWEDEN
[6] STATE UNIV GHENT,DEPT CLIN BIOCHEM & CLIN ANAL,B-9000 GHENT,BELGIUM
关键词
ANALYSIS OF VARIATION; EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1177/000456329303000313
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Two lyophilized control sera were distributed through seven national external quality assessment schemes in six European countries-Belgium, Switzerland, France, The Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom-participated in the study. The results for 17 routine analytes were obtained from almost 5000 laboratories for the two sera. The organizers of the schemes were asked to process the results according to a common outlier removal procedure, and submit method-related data if available. The two sera were also distributed through the external/internal scheme of The Netherlands, and the within-laboratory standard deviations calculated in this scheme have been used in a scaling procedure for the external mean values and between-laboratory standard deviations of the participating countries. The results show remarkable agreement in the national mean values for practically all analytes, but considerable differences in the between-laboratory variation. Data from comparable method groups was obtained for 12 analytes from Belgium, France, The Netherlands and the UK. Though revealing some specific differences between methods and countries, the method-related data are generally in agreement with the all-method data. In this study reference method values were only available for cholesterol. The high degree of agreement found suggests, however, that mutual recognition of all-method mean values in national schemes could be acceptable, especially for analytes for which reliable reference methods are not available. The major element of variation is between-laboratory rather than between-country.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 314
页数:11
相关论文
共 12 条